The public proceduralization of contingency: Bruno Latour and the formation of collective experiments
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Epistemology 24 (1):63 – 74 (2010)
Social scientists have traditionally attempted to avoid extending strategies for acquiring experimental knowledge to the sphere of the social. Bruno Latour, however, has introduced a notion of the collective experiment, an experiment conducted by and with us all. In this short paper I seek to explore, by way of elucidating the talk of collective experiments, that Latour's notion has long since existed in the theory and practice of ecological design and restoration. Practitioners in ecological restoration projects find themselves in a situation of double contingency, since neither do they know how nature will respond to their intervention nor is their interpretation of these responses already certain. Experimental practice in society then becomes the proceduralization of this contingency
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Pierre Bourdieu (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity. University of Chicago Press.
Mark B. Brown (2006). Survey Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation. Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (2):203–225.
John Dewey (1998). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
Bruno Latour (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences Into Democracy. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bruno Latour (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press.
Bruno Latour (2010). A Collective of Humans and Nonhumans. In Craig Hanks (ed.), Technology and Values: Essential Readings. Wiley-Blackwell.
Bruno Latour (1988). The Author Rebounds: Latour to Oldroyd. Social Epistemology 2 (2):183.
Bruno Latour (1987). The Author Responds: Latour to Oldroyd. Social Epistemology 1 (4):347 – 350.
Lucía Lewowicz (2003). Materialism, Symmetry and Eliminativism in the Latest Latour. Social Epistemology 17 (4):381 – 400.
Jeff Kochan (2010). Latour's Heidegger. Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.
Bruno Latour, Graham Harman & Peter Erdélyi (eds.) (2011). The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Zero Books.
Nicholas J. Rowland, Jan-Hendrik Passoth & Alexander B. Kinney (2011). Latour's Greatest Hits, Reassembled: Review of Bruno Latour's Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. [REVIEW] Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):95-99.
Bruno Latour (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads31 ( #63,479 of 1,413,246 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #67,254 of 1,413,246 )
How can I increase my downloads?