|Abstract||Papers that study real world phenomena with the help of agent-based models often offer direct policy advice. The measures recommended refer to measures taken by real policy makers, not to interventions in a model. Yet the recommendations are based only on the results that simulated interventions had in simulated worlds. So how can a policy maker justify a (real) policy choice on the basis of such simulation results? I discuss four decision procedures and their appropriateness for this question. In particular, I argue that the applicability of specific rational decision procedures to any given ABM depends on (i) the result of the AGM, (ii) the way the AGM represented the output, and (ii) the degree to which the AGM is empirically validated.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Eleonora Montuschi (2009). Questions of Evidence in Evidence-Based Policy. Axiomathes 19 (4).
Nancy Cartwright (2009). Evidence-Based Policy: What's to Be Done About Relevance? Philosophical Studies 143 (1):127 - 136.
Nigel Gilbert & Pietro Terna (2000). How to Build and Use Agent-Based Models in Social Science. Mind and Society 1 (1):57-72.
Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni (2007). Determining Public Policy and Resource Allocation Priorities for Mitigating Natural Hazards: A Capabilities-Based Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4).
Andreas Lange (2001). A Note on Decisions Under Uncertainty: The Impact of the Choice of the Welfare Measure. Theory and Decision 51 (1):51-71.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?