Conflict and engagement: An empirical study of a farmer-extension partnership in a sustainable agriculture program [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):79-100 (2000)
Stakeholder engagement is a crucial conceptof extension education. Engagement expressesdemocratic values of the land-grant mission byproviding opportunities for stakeholders to influenceprogram planning, including setting the agenda andnegotiating resource allocations. In practice, theconcept of engagement guides the formation ofpartnerships among extension, communities, industry,and government. In the area of sustainableagriculture, however, stakeholders may conflict,presenting challenges to the engagement process.Results from a study of a Canadian sustainableagriculture program, produced using culturalanthropology and participatory action research, detailchallenges of the engagement process that led toreconstruction of a farmer-extension partnership.Notable in the early phase of the reconstructionprocess were critical reflection, stakeholder forums,exclusion through caucusing, and coalition building.An argument for a neo-pragmatist view provides atheoretical basis for understanding counterintuitivedimensions of engagement revealed by the study.
|Keywords||adult education engagement farm planning Ontario participatory action research partnerships sustainable agriculture|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ulrike Felt & Maximilian Fochler (2010). Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-Scribing Publics in Public Engagement. Minerva 48 (3):219-238.
Cyrlene Claasen & Julia Roloff (2012). The Link Between Responsibility and Legitimacy: The Case of De Beers in Namibia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):379-398.
Chieh-Peng Lin (2010). Modeling Corporate Citizenship, Organizational Trust, and Work Engagement Based on Attachment Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 94 (4):517 - 531.
Haico Te Kulve & Arie Rip (2011). Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-Engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):699-714.
Daan Schuurbiers, Susanne Sleenhoff, Johannes Jacobs & Patricia Osseweijer (2009). Multidisciplinary Engagement with Nanoethics Through Education—The Nanobio-RAISE Advanced Courses as a Case Study and Model. NanoEthics 3 (3):197-211.
Susanne Sleenhoff Daan Schuurbiers, F. Jacobs Johannes & Patricia Osseweijer (2009). Multidisciplinary Engagement with Nanoethics Through Education—the Nanobio-Raise Advanced Courses as a Case Study and Model. NanoEthics 3 (3).
Craig Cormick (2010). The Challenges of Community Engagement. NanoEthics 4 (3):229-231.
Shelby L. Sheppard (2011). School Engagement: A 'Danse Macabre'? Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (1):111-123.
Carine Girard & André Sobczak (2012). Towards a Model of Corporate and Social Stakeholder Engagement: Analyzing the Relations Between a French Mutual Bank and Its Members. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):215-225.
Michelle Greenwood (2007). Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):315 - 327.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #165,352 of 1,410,127 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,127 )
How can I increase my downloads?