Is object-relations theory better founded than orthodox psychoanalysis? A reply to Jane Flax
Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):46-51 (1983)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGlyn W. Humphreys & M. Jane Riddoch (2007). How to Define an Object: Evidence From the Effects of Action on Perception and Attention. Mind and Language 22 (5):534–547.
Jane A. Russo (2012). The Social Diffusion of Psychoanalysis During the Brazilian Military Regime : Psychological Awareness in an Age of Political Repression. In Joy Damousi & Mariano Ben Plotkin (eds.), Psychoanalysis and Politics: Histories of Psychoanalysis Under Conditions of Restricted Political Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Axel Honneth (1999). Postmodern Identity and Object-Relations Theory: On the Seeming Obsolescence of Psychoanalysis. Philosophical Explorations 2 (3):225 – 242.
Jane Flax (1993). Multiples: On the Contemporary Politics of Subjectivity. Human Studies 16 (1-2):33 - 49.
Susan Moller Okin (1995). Response to Jane Flax. Political Theory 23 (3):511-516.
Jane Flax (1995). Race/Gender and the Ethics of Difference: A Reply to Okin's "Gender Inequality and Cultural Differences". Political Theory 23 (3):500-510.
Jane Flax (1981). Psychoanalysis and the Philosophy of Science: Critique or Resistance? Journal of Philosophy 78 (10):561-569.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,730 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
