Provider-initiated hiv testing and counseling in health facilities – what does this mean for the health and human rights of pregnant women?
Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):23–32 (2008)
|Abstract||Since the introduction of drugs to prevent vertical transmission of HIV, the purpose of and approach to HIV testing of pregnant women has increasingly become an area of major controversy. In recent years, many strategies to increase the uptake of HIV testing have focused on offering HIV tests to women in pregnancy-related services. New global guidance issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) specifically notes these services as an entry point for provider-initiated HIV testing and counseling (PITC). The guidance constitutes a useful first step towards a framework within which PITC sensitive to health, human rights and ethical concerns can be provided to pregnant women in health facilities. However, a number of issues will require further attention as implementation moves forward. It is incumbent on all those involved in the scale up of PITC to ensure that it promotes long-term connection with relevant health services and does not result simply in increased testing with no concrete benefits being accrued by the women being tested. Within health services, this will require significant attention to informed consent, pre- and post-test counseling, patient confidentiality, referrals and access to appropriate services, as well as reduction of stigma and discrimination. Beyond health services, efforts will be needed to address larger societal, legal, policy and contextual issues. The health and human rights of pregnant women must be a primary consideration in how HIV testing is implemented; they can benefit greatly from PITC but only if it is carried out appropriately.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matthew W. Pierce, Suzanne Maman, Allison K. Groves, Elizabeth J. King & Sarah C. Wyckoff (2011). Testing Public Health Ethics: Why the CDC's HIV Screening Recommendations May Violate the Least Infringement Principle. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):263-271.
Harold W. Jaffe (2009). Increasing Knowledge of Hiv Infection Status Through Opt-Out Testing. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2).
Cynthia Eyakuze, Debra A. Jones, Ann M. Starrs & Naomi Sorkin (2008). From Pmtct to a More Comprehensive Aids Response for Women: A Much-Needed Shift. Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):33–42.
Ruth Macklin (2011). Ethical Challenges in HIV Microbicide Research: What Protections Do Women Need? International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2).
Matthew K. Wynia (2006). Routine Screening: Informed Consent, Stigma and the Waning of HIV Exceptionalism. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):5 – 8.
Leslie London, Phyllis J. Orner & Landon Myer (2008). 'Even If You're Positive, You Still Have Rights Because You Are a Person': Human Rights and the Reproductive Choice of Hiv-Positive Persons. Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):11-22.
Stuart Rennie & Bavon Mupenda (2008). Ethics of Mandatory Premarital Hiv Testing in Africa: The Case of Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo. Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):126-137.
Russell Armstrong (2008). Mandatory Hiv Testing in Pregnancy: Is There Ever a Time? Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):1–10.
Martin Gunderson, David J. Mayo & Frank S. Rhame (1996). Routine HIV Testing of Hospital Patients and Pregnant Women: Informed Consent in the Real World. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2).
Kjell Arne Johansson, Kirsten Bjerkreim Pedersen & Anna-Karin Andersson (2011). Hiv Testing of Pregnant Women: An Ethical Analysis. Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):109-119.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #145,761 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?