Religions Challenged by Contingency: Theological and Philosophical Approaches to the Problem of Contingency
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The relationship between religion and contingency is investigated historically and systematically. Its historical part comprises analyses of important philosophers’ interpretation of this relationship, viz. that of Leibniz, Kant, Lessing, Jaspers, and Heidegger. Its systematic part analyses how this relationship should be currently interpreted
|Keywords||Contingency (Philosophy Religion Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$66.40 used (46% off) $84.96 new (31% off) $109.80 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD595.R45 2008|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Xunwu Chen (2011). Crisis and Possibility: The Ethical Implication of Contingency. Asian Philosophy 21 (3):257 - 268.
Margaret J. Osler (1994/2004). Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World. Cambridge University Press.
Barry Allen (2003). The Abyss of Contingency: Purposiveness and Contingency in Darwin and Kant. History of Philosophy Quarterly 20 (4):373 - 391.
Shannon Nason (2012). Contingency, Necessity, and Causation in Kierkegaard's Theory of Change. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):141-162.
Piet Strydom (2001). The Problem of Triple Contingency in Habermas. Sociological Theory 19 (2):165-186.
Clint Ballinger, Classifying Contingency in the Social Sciences: Diachronic, Synchronic, and Deterministic Contingency.
Anthony J. Godzieba (2004). The Fear of Time and the Joys of Contingency. Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):77-88.
William Timberlake (2004). Is the Operant Contingency Enough for a Science of Purposive Behavior? Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):197 - 229.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?