David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 159 (3):389 - 416 (2007)
An attempt is made to defend a general approach to the spatial content of perception, an approach according to which perception is imbued with spatial content in virtue of certain kinds of connections between perceiving organism's sensory input and its behavioral output. The most important aspect of the defense involves clearly distinguishing two kinds of perceptuo-behavioral skills—the formation of dispositions, and a capacity for emulation. The former, the formation of dispositions, is argued to by the central pivot of spatial content. I provide a neural information processing interpretation of what these dispositions amount to, and describe how dispositions, so understood, are an obvious implementation of Gareth Evans' proposal on the topic. Furthermore, I describe what sorts of contribution are made by emulation mechanisms, and I also describe exactly how the emulation framework differs from similar but distinct notions with which it is often unhelpfully confused, such as sensorimotor contingencies and forward models
|Keywords||Spatial perception Skill theory Sensorimotor contingencies Emulation theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Adrian Cussins (1992). Content, Embodiment, and Objectivity: The Theory of Cognitive Trails. Mind 101 (404):651-88.
Michel Desmurget & Scott Grafton (2000). Forward Modeling Allows Feedback Control for Fast Reaching Movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (11):423-431.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Briscoe (2009). Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):423 - 460.
Pete Mandik (2010). Control Consciousness. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):643-657.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1999). Lewis on Finkish Dispositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):703-710.
K. Sathian (2004). Modality, Quo Vadis? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):413-414.
Andreas Hüttemann (2007). Causation, Laws and Dispositions. In Max Kistler & Bruno Gnassounou (eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers. Ashgate.
Daniel M. Merfeld (2004). Internal Models and Spatial Orientation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):410-410.
Ricarda I. Schubotz & D. Yves von Cramon (2004). Brains Have Emulators with Brains: Emulation Economized. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):414-415.
Francisco Calvo Garzón (2004). Issues of Implementation Matter for Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):397-398.
Rick Grush (2004). Further Explorations of the Empirical and Theoretical Aspects of the Emulation Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):425-435.
Rick Grush (2004). The Emulation Theory of Representation: Motor Control, Imagery, and Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):377-396.
Rick Grush (1998). Perception, Imagery, and the Sensorimotor Loop. In F. Esken & F.-D. Heckman (eds.), A Consciousness Reader. Schoeningh Verlag.
Catherine L. Reed, Jefferson D. Grubb & Piotr Winkielman (2004). Emulation Theory Offers Conceptual Gains but Needs Filters. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):411-412.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #19,232 of 1,693,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #9,763 of 1,693,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?