David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (1):63-89 (2012)
This paper concerns the relations binding British idealist thought to nineteenth and twentieth century disputes in political philosophy. Two of them in particular are considered: the disputes between liberalism and conservatism, and the disputes between liberals and communitarians. The paper explores the conciliatory, individualist-communitarian character of idealist thought. The first step of the argument is the characterization of liberal-conservative/ liberal-communitarian standpoints. Then some of the fundamental elements of idealist social and political thought are analyzed: the social recognition thesis, the concepts of common good and positive liberty. On this basis, the following features are considered crucial to the acceptance of the liberal- communitarian/conservative character of the idealists' theories: teleology; the metaphysical foundation of politics; contextualism; a tension between ethical relativism and universalism; the criticism of the concept of negative freedom; and individualism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Neera Kapur Badhwar (1993). The Circumstances of Justice: Pluralism, Community, and Friendship. Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (3):250–276.
Filiz Kartal (2006). The Rights-Bearing Citizen as a Problematic Actor of Liberal Politics. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:159-163.
Mark S. Cladis (1995). Education, Virtue and Democracy in the Work of Emile Durkheim. Journal of Moral Education 24 (1):37-52.
Peter Lindsay (2002). The 'Disembodied Self' in Political Theory: The Communitarians, Macpherson and Marx. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2):191-211.
Rutger Claassen (2011). The Conservative Challenge to Liberalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):465-485.
Adam J. Chmielewski (2007). The Enlightenment's Concept of the Individual and its Contemporary Criticism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):41-59.
David Miller (1981). Philosophy and Ideology in Hume's Political Thought. Oxford University Press.
John Tomasi (1994). Community in the Minimal State1. Critical Review 8 (2):285-296.
Andrew Jason Cohen (2000). On Universalism: Communitarians, Rorty, and (“Objectivist”) “Liberal Metaphysicians”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):39-75.
James Hudson (1994). Individual and Community: Charles Murray's Political Philosophy. Critical Review 8 (2):175-216.
Andrew Jason Cohen (2000). Does Communitarianism Require Individual Independence? Journal of Ethics 4 (3):283-304.
Jonathan Salem-Wiseman (2003). Heidegger's Dasein and the Liberal Conception of the Self. Political Theory 31 (4):533-557.
Daniel Bell (1993). Communitarianism and its Critics. Clarendon Press.
Added to index2011-08-26
Total downloads6 ( #206,773 of 1,102,846 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,846 )
How can I increase my downloads?