David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 13 (2):287-309 (2001)
This paper suggests that Ricoeur’s language about God can be read as a “symbol that gives rise to thought,” or even specifically as a symbol for “hope.” It examines the tensions found in Ricoeur’s hermeneutics in four layers of such symbolic language: First, the language of faith, for Ricoeur, is essentially circular, is poetic language, a language of manifestation and not of adequation. Second, the biblical discourse is composed of several kinds of languages, a polyphony of discourses that provide different (though individually always incomplete) paths toward God. Third, these discourses are characterized by limit-expressions that introduce extravagance and excess into God-language and open paths to new possibilities. Finally, Ricoeur’s theological language emphasizes paradox, perplexity, enigmas; it stays open toward any thinking about God that gives rise to new thoughts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthew T. Eggemeier (2012). Lévinas and Ricoeur on the Possibility of God After the End of Theodicy. Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):23-48.
Stephanie Theodorou (2007). Two Theories of Ontological Disclosure. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:77-83.
Gert-Jan van der Heiden (2011). Announcement, Attestation, and Equivocity. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (3):415-432.
Kevin J. Vanhoozer (1990). Biblical Narrative in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: A Study in Hermeneutics and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
Theodore W. Jennings (1985). Beyond Theism: A Grammar of God-Language. Oxford University Press.
John W. Cooper (2000). Supplemental but Not Equal. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):116-125.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2006). Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricœur and H.G. Gadamer. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):313-345.
Henry I. Venema, Paul Ricoeur's Interpretation of Selfhood and its Significance for Philosophy of Religion.
Richard Kearney (2009). Returning to God After God: Levinas, Derrida, Ricoeur. Research in Phenomenology 39 (2):167-183.
Paul Ricœur (1981). Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation. Editions De La Maison des Sciences De L'Homme.
Robert Piercey (2008). How Paul Ricoeur Changed the World. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):463-479.
Farhang Erfani (2009). We Are Not Saints, But We Have Kept Our Appointment. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):115-123.
Simon Beck (2006). Fiction and Fictions: On Ricoeur on the Route to the Self. South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):329-335.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads14 ( #170,159 of 1,700,362 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #206,271 of 1,700,362 )
How can I increase my downloads?