David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3) (2008)
Research has demonstrated that employee reactions to monitoring systems depend on both the characteristics of the monitoring system and how it is implemented. However, little is known about the role individual differences may play in this process. This study proposes that individuals have generalized attitudes toward organizational control and monitoring activities. We examined this argument by assessing the relationship between employees’ baseline attitudes toward a set of monitoring and control techniques that span the employment relationship. We further explore the effects of employees’ generalized attitudes toward monitoring and their individual ethical orientations on their attitudinal reactions to an Internet monitoring system implemented in their workplace. Results of a longitudinal study indicate that as expected, prior beliefs and ethical orientation interact to affect employees’ reactions to monitoring systems. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Darren Charters (2002). Electronic Monitoring and Privacy Issues in Business-Marketing: The Ethics of the Doubleclick Experience. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 35 (4):243 - 254.
Kevin W. Mossholder, William F. Giles & Mark A. Wesolowski (1991). Information Privacy and Performance Appraisal: An Examination of Employee Perceptions and Reactions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):151 - 156.
G. Stoney Alder (1998). Ethical Issues in Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Consideration of Deontological and Teleological Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (7):729-743.
William P. Smith & Filiz Tabak (2005). Who Do You Trust? Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:33-37.
Stephen R. Hawk (1994). The Effects of Computerized Performance Monitoring: An Ethical Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):949 - 957.
G. Stoney Alder, Marshall Schminke & Terry W. Noel (2007). The Impact of Individual Ethics on Reactions to Potentially Invasive HR Practices. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):201 - 214.
Seumas Miller & John Weckert (2000). Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
Kirsten E. Martin & R. Edward Freeman (2003). Some Problems with Employee Monitoring. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (4):353 - 361.
Thomas J. Hodson, Fred Englander & Valerie Englander (1999). Ethical, Legal and Economic Aspects of Employer Monitoring of Employee Electronic Mail. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):99 - 108.
G. Stoney Alder, Marshall Schminke, Terry W. Noel & Maribeth Kuenzi (2008). Employee Reactions to Internet Monitoring: The Moderating Role of Ethical Orientation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3):481 - 498.
Added to index2009-05-04
Total downloads31 ( #124,661 of 1,792,164 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #282,315 of 1,792,164 )
How can I increase my downloads?