Perfect or Bounded Rationality?: Some Facts, Speculations and Proposals

Analyse & Kritik 26 (2):364-381 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Simple game experiments of the reward allocation, dictator and ultimatum type are used to demonstrate that true explanations of social phenomena cannot conceivably be derived in terms of the perfect rationality concept underlying neo-classical economics. We explore in some depth, if speculatively, how experimental game theory might bring us closer to a new synthesis or at least the nucleus of a general theory of ‘games and boundedly rational economic behavior’ with enhanced explanatory power.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Multistage Game Models and Delay Supergames.Reinhard Selten - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (1):1-36.
Bounded Scott Set Saturation.Alex M. McAllister - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (2):245-259.
Perfect and workable rationality: A comment on Raymond Boudon's paper.Hartmut Kliemt - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (1):41 – 43.
Artificial Intelligence and evolutionary theory: Herbert Simon's unifying framework.Roberto Cordeschi - 2011 - In C. Cellucci, E. Grosholz & E. Ippoliti (eds.), Logic and knowledge. Cambridge Scholars Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-19

Downloads
48 (#322,994)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations