Erkenntnis 59 (1):77 - 95 (2003)
|Abstract||David Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics yields a quantum potential, Q. In his early work, the effects of Q are understood in causal terms as acting through a real (quantum) field which pushes particles around. In his later work (with Basil Hiley), the causal understanding of Q appears to have been abandoned. The purpose of this paper is to understand how the use of certain metaphors leads Bohm away from a causal treatment of Q, and to evaluate the use of those metaphors.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. Matzkin & V. Nurock, Are Bohmian Trajectories Real? On the Dynamical Mismatch Between de Broglie-Bohm and Classical Dynamics in Semiclassical Systems.
Sheldon Goldstein, Bohmian Mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Craig Callender & Robert Weingard (1994). The Bohmian Model of Quantum Cosmology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:218 - 227.
Michael Dickson (1996). Antidote or Theory? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 27 (2):229-238.
Nick Huggett & Robert Weingard (1994). Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory. Philosophy of Science 61 (3):370-388.
Frederick M. Kronz (1998). Bohm's Ontological Interpretation and its Relations to Three Formulations of Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 117 (1):31-52.
Basil J. Hiley & D. Peat (eds.) (1987). Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm. Methuen.
Peter J. Riggs (2008). Reflections on the Debroglie–Bohm Quantum Potential. Erkenntnis 68 (1):21 - 39.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,366 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?