David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper identifies and explains three of the philosophically substantial senses in which Nietzsche writes of the historical character of things and argues that, according to Nietzsche, recognizing these three distinct senses is necessary to understand subjectivity. I refer to these three senses as “general historicity,” “special historicity,” and “narrativity.” According to general historicity, history is the continuity of powerful transindividual processes that shape or determine present conditions or events. According to special historicity, certain things are constituted by meanings only available through historical appeals; the human abilities to interpret, organize, remember, and forget allow for a continuation of the past into the present and a protention of the future such that diachronic patterns take on significance and constitute the character of things. These two forms of historicity, according to Nietzsche, provoke a “self-contradiction in the form of time” that can be resolved by satisfying three constraints: “active forgetting,” “retroactive force,” and the absence of “revenge against time.” Narrativity, which offers a metahistorical account of the self-relation that emerges in relation to general and special historicity, satisfies these constraints. History in the sense of narrativity comprises the actualizing of historical agency by integrating historical contributions in a way that itself takes the form of stories. Narrativity, that is, is the historical form of the active mediation of historical contributions; it thus clarifies the ways in which human subjectivity is both determined and determining, and how these two elements are inextricable from one another.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pol Capdevila (2009). Historizität und Intersubjektivität der ästhetischen Erfahrung. Eine Positionierung zwischen Jauß und Kant. Estetika 46 (2):119-143.
Peter Koslowski (ed.) (2005). The Discovery of Historicity in German Idealism and Historism. Springer.
Theodore R. Schatzki (2003). Living Out of the Past: Dilthey and Heidegger on Life and History. Inquiry 46 (3):301 – 323.
Christopher Grau (2010). Love and History. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):246-271.
Stefan Lukits (2011). Narrativity and the Symbolic Vacuum. Philosophy and Theology 23 (1):167-183.
Theodore Arabatzis (2011). On the Historicity of Scientific Objects. Erkenntnis 75 (3):377-390.
Kenneth B. McIntyre (2008). Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood's Influence on Skinner and Gadamer. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):138-166.
Eric Desjardins (2011). Historicity and Experimental Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):339-364.
Espen Hammer (2011). Philosophy and Temporality From Kant to Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #63,881 of 1,100,757 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,565 of 1,100,757 )
How can I increase my downloads?