David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 53 (4):490-513 (2003)
: Suggestiveness is a major theoretical category in Chinese aesthetic thought. Within the broader context of Chinese tradition, it is a product of the interpenetration of and exchanges between philosophical and artistic discourses. Despite its prevalence in Chinese aesthetic thought, suggestiveness has never been examined as an aesthetic category in its own right, nor have its implications been explored in relation to contemporary theories. This essay reexamines suggestiveness and its seminal ideas as an aesthetic category in Chinese tradition, exploring their relation to philosophical thought and reconceptualizing their implications in terms of the postmodern idea of literary openness. As a preliminary attempt to pioneer an approach to Chinese aesthetic theory that may emancipate it from intellectual stagnation and at the same time preserve its characteristic features, this essay also intends to inquire whether insights of Chinese aesthetics, often characterized as gems of "Oriental mysticism," can be understood in terms of reflective analysis and have a meaningful dialogue with contemporary Western literary thought
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sarah Mattice (2013). Artistry as Methodology: Aesthetic Experience and Chinese Philosophy1. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):199-209.
Similar books and articles
François Jullien (2004). In Praise of Blandness: Proceeding From Chinese Thought and Aesthetics. Zone Books.
Rafael de Clercq (2005). Aesthetic Terms, Metaphor, and the Nature of Aesthetic Properties. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):27–32.
Zhu Bokun (1998). Daoist Patterns of Thought and the Tradition of Chinese Metaphysics. Contemporary Chinese Thought 29 (3):13-71.
Robert Wilkinson (2004). El concepto de lo profundo en Oriente y Occidente. Suplementos de Contrastes: Revista Interdisciplinar de Filosofía 9:201-214.
Ts'ai I. (1975). Why is Chu Kuang-Ch'ien's Aesthetic Thought Subjective Idealism? Contemporary Chinese Thought 6 (3):62-118.
Qingping Liu (2006). The Worldwide Significance of Chinese Aesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):33-40.
Haina Zhang, Malcolm H. Cone, André M. Everett & Graham Elkin (2011). Aesthetic Leadership in Chinese Business: A Philosophical Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 101 (3):475-491.
Zongqi Cai (ed.) (2004). Chinese Aesthetics: The Ordering of Literature, the Arts, and the Universe in the Six Dynasties. University of Hawai'i Press.
Ming Dong Gu (2009). From Yuanqi (Primal Energy) to Wenqi (Literary Pneuma): A Philosophical Study of a Chinese Aesthetic. Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 22-46.
Jane Cauvel (1999). The Transformative Power of Art: Li Zehou's Aesthetic Theory. Philosophy East and West 49 (2):150-173.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads279 ( #9,142 of 1,937,419 )
Recent downloads (6 months)51 ( #8,531 of 1,937,419 )
How can I increase my downloads?