Biological Theory 4 (2):148-158 (2009)
|Abstract||This article provides the foundation for a new predictive theory of animal learning that is based upon a simple logical model. The knowledge of experimental subjects at a given time is described using logical equations. These logical equations are then used to predict a subject’s response when presented with a known or a previously unknown situation. This new theory suc- cessfully anticipates phenomena that existing theories predict, as well as phenomena that they cannot. It provides a theoretical account for phenomena that are beyond the domain of existing models, such as extinction and the detection of novelty, from which “external inhibition” can be explained. Examples of the methods applied to make predictions are given using previously published results. The present theory proposes a new way to envision the minimal functions of the nervous system, and provides possible new insights into the way that brains ultimately create and use knowledge about the world.|
|Keywords||associative learning extinction habituation novelty detection operant conditioning Pavlovian conditioning superconditioning latent inhibition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hernán I. Savastano & Ralph R. Miller (2004). Behavioral Momentum in Pavlovian Conditioning and the Learning/Performance Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):694-695.
J. Furedy, B. Damke & W. Boucsein (2000). Revisiting the Learning-Without-Awareness Question in Human Pavlovian Autonomic Conditioning: Focus on Extinction in a Dichotic Listening Paradigm. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 35 (1):17-34.
John D. Baldwin (2000). Let's Go All the Way – and Include Operant and Observational Learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):249-250.
Claudia D. Cardinal, Matthew E. Andrzejewski & Philip N. Hineline (2000). Is the Avoiding of Operant Theory a Pavlovian Conditioned Response? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):252-253.
Randolph C. Grace & John A. Nevin (2004). Behavioral Momentum and Pavlovian Conditioning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):695-697.
Douglas V. Porpora (1980). Operant Conditioning and Teleology. Philosophy of Science 47 (4):568-582.
Michael Domjan, Brian Cusato & Ronald Villarreal (2000). Pavlovian Feed-Forward Mechanisms in the Control of Social Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):235-249.
William J. Rowland (2000). Pavlovian Conditioning as a Product of Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):262-263.
Peter R. Killeen (2000). Boxing Day. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):259-260.
Jan de Houwer (2006). Using the Implicit Association Test Does Not Rule Out an Impact of Conscious Propositional Knowledge on Evaluative Conditioning. Learning and Motivation 37 (2):176-187.
Peter D. Balsam & Michael R. Drew (2004). Learning Theory, Feed-Forward Mechanisms, and the Adaptiveness of Conditioned Responding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):698-698.
Karen L. Hollis (2000). Strategies for Integrating Biological Theory, Control Systems Theory, and Pavlovian Conditioning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):258-259.
John Bickle (1995). Psychoneural Reduction of the Genuinely Cognitive: Some Accomplished Facts. Philosophical Psychology 8 (3):265-85.
A. P. Field (2000). Evaluative Conditioning is Pavlovian Conditioning: Issues of Definition, Measurement, and the Theoretical Importance of Contingency Awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (1):41-49.
A. Field (2000). I Like It, but I'm Not Sure Why: Can Evaluative Conditioning Occur Without Conscious Awareness? Consciousness and Cognition 9 (1):13-36.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads26 ( #53,527 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #11,515 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?