Commentary on: “How are scientific corrections made?” (N. kiang)
Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4) (1995)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul Humphreys (1995). Computational Science and Scientific Method. Minds and Machines 5 (4):499-512.
Francisco Aboitiz (1998). To Normalize or Not to Normalize for Overall Size? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
Eric S. Lander (1998). Scientific Commentary: The Scientific Foundations and Medical and Social Prospects of the Human Genome Project. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (3):184-188.
Michael E. Gorman (1999). Implicit Knowledge in Engineering Judgment and Scientific Reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):767-768.
Anne Victoria Neale, Justin Northrup, Rhonda Dailey, Ellen Marks & Judith Abrams (2007). Correction and Use of Biomedical Literature Affected by Scientific Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1).
P. J. D. Drenth (2006). Responsible Conduct in Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.
Paul M. Quay (1974). Progress as a Demarcation Criterion for the Sciences. Philosophy of Science 41 (2):154-170.
Nelson Yuan-sheng Kiang (1995). How Are Scientific Corrections Made? Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4).
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,507 of 548,976 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
