David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 145 (2):177 - 232 (2005)
Engaging a listener’s trust imposes moral demands upon a presenter in respect of truthtelling and completeness. An agent lies by an utterance that satisfies what are herein defined as signal and mendacity conditions; an agent deceives when, in satisfaction of those conditions, the agent’s utterances contribute to a false belief or thwart a true one. I advert to how we may fool ourselves in observation and in the perception of our originality. Communication with others depends upon a convention or practice of presumed nonuniversal truthfulness. In support of an asserted duty of nondeceptiveness, I offer a reconciliation of pertinent Kantian passages, a sketch of arguments within utilitarianism, contractarianism, and other views, and an account arguing for application of that duty to assertions, implicatures, omissions, equivocation, prevarication, and sophistry insofar as they affect listeners’ doxastic states. For scholarship, this duty is exceptionless. I describe the kernel of intellectual honesty as a virtuous disposition such that when presented with an incentive to deceive, the agent will not deceive. Intellectual honesty delivers candor when it counts. I contrast this with complementary virtues and the surpassing virtue of ingenuousness. An account is given of the connection between intellectual honesty and an influential physical model of integrity.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy of Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
James A. Marcum (2009). The Epistemically Virtuous Clinician. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (3):249-265.
Similar books and articles
Wiebe Hoek, Jan Jaspars & Elias Thijsse (1996). Honesty in Partial Logic. Studia Logica 56 (3):323 - 360.
Jeff Malpas (2008). Truth, Lies, and Deceit. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):1-12.
Sue P. Stafford (2010). Intellectual Virtues in Environmental Virtue Ethics. Environmental Ethics 32 (4):339-352.
Roy Serpa (1985). Creating a Candid Corporate Culture. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (5):425 - 430.
Wiebe van Der Hoek & Elias Thijsse (2002). A General Approach to Multi-Agent Minimal Knowledge: With Tools and Samples. Studia Logica 72 (1):61 - 84.
Holger Zaborowski (2010). From Modesty to Dynamite, From Socrates to Dionysus. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2):337-356.
Wiebe van der Hoek & Elias Thijsse (2002). A General Approach to Multi-Agent Minimal Knowledge: With Tools and Samples. Studia Logica 72 (1):61-84.
R. S. M. Patricia C. Flynn (2007). Honesty and Intimacy in Kant's Duty of Friendship. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):417-424.
Patricia C. Flynn (2007). Honesty and Intimacy in Kant's Duty of Friendship. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):417-424.
Jan Steutel & Ben Speicker (1997). Rational Passions and Intellectual Virtues, A Conceptual Analysis. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):59-71.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #79,709 of 1,410,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?