Lawyers, Context, and Legitimacy: A New Theory of Legal Ethics
Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 25 (1):107-164 (2012)
| Abstract | Even good lawyers get a bad rap. One explanation for this is that the professional rules governing lawyers permit and even require behavior that strikes many as immoral. The standard accounts of legal ethics that seek to defend these professional rules do little to dispel this air of immorality. The revisionary accounts of legal ethics that criticize the professional rules inject a hearty dose of morality, but at the cost of leaving lawyers unrecognizable as lawyers. This article suggests that the problem with both the professional rules and the extant accounts of legal ethics is that they treat the role of lawyer as largely uniform, whereas lawyers actually serve several importantly different roles in different contexts. The central insight of the article is that legal ethics must be fundamentally context-sensitive: what lawyers are morally permitted or required to do depends on the background context in which they are working. Additionally, by taking context into account, this article is the first to present a theory of legal ethics as appropriately shaped and constrained by normative political philosophy and norms of political legitimacy. Specifically, the article argues that people act as lawyers in three different contexts: State v. Individual (situations in which the State seeks to apply some general law to a particular individual), Individual v. Individual (situations in which private individuals are engaged in a dispute), and Individual v. State (situations in which individuals object to State conduct on constitutional or other grounds unrelated to the question of whether a general law applies to their particular case); that the value of lawyers, qua lawyers, stems from a different source in each of these contexts; and that a theory of legal ethics must take into account both of these first two claims. This article develops one such theory - the Multi-Context View. To demonstrate how the theory applies in practice, the article applies the Multi-Context View to two significant issues in legal ethics: the ethical issues involved in deciding whether to represent a client and the moral permissibility of the use of tactical delay. | |||||||||
| Keywords | legal ethics political philosophy political legitimacy professional ethics | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGeoffrey C. Hazard (2004). Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study. Stanford University Press.
M. B. E. Smith (1990). Should Lawyers Listen to Philosophers About Legal Ethics? Law and Philosophy 9 (1):67 - 93.
Alice Woolley (2011). Legal Ethics and Regulatory Legitimacy : Regulating Lawyers for Personal Misconduct. In Reid Mortensen, Francesca Bartlett & Kieran Tranter (eds.), Alternative Perspectives on Lawyers and Legal Ethics: Reimagining the Profession. Routledge.
Francesca Bartlett (2011). The Role of Apologies in Professional Discipline. Legal Ethics 14 (1):49-72.
Barbara Robin Mescher (2008). The Business of Commercial Legal Advice and the Ethical Implications for Lawyers and Their Clients. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):913 - 926.
David B. Wilkins (2012). Some Realism About Legal Realism for Lawyers: Assessing the Role of Context in Legal Ethics. In Leslie C. Levin & Lynn M. Mather (eds.), Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context. The University of Chicago Press.
Donald Nicolson & Julian Webb (2000). Professional Legal Ethics: Critical Interrogations. OUP Oxford.
Suzanne le Mire (2011). Testing Times: In-House Counsel and Independence. Legal Ethics 14 (1):21-47.
Karl J. Mackie (1989). Business Regulation, Business Ethics and the Professional Employee. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (8):607 - 616.
Joanne Stagg-Taylor (2012). Lawyers' Business: Conflicts of Duties Arising From Lawyers' Business Models. Legal Ethics 14 (2):173-192.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-06-14Total downloads14 ( #82,984 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
