Graduate studies at Western
Angelaki 16 (2):19 - 33 (2011)
|Abstract||While Merleau-Ponty does not theorize sexual difference at any great length, his concepts of the flesh and the institution of a sense suggest hitherto undeveloped possibilities for articulating sexual difference beyond the male?female binary. For Merleau-Ponty, flesh is a ?pregnancy of possibilities? which gives rise to masculine and feminine forms through a process of mutual divergence and encroachment. Both sexes bear ?the possible of the other,? and neither represents the first or generic form of the human; each sex bears the possibility of the other. By approaching sexual difference in terms of intersubjectively distributed possibilities rather than interlocking forms or types, we may grasp sexual difference in terms of both a developmental process in which bodies become sexed (and sometimes re-sexed) over time, and in terms of a social-historical process in which patterns of relation and exchange between sexed bodies shift over time, altering the very sense of sexual difference|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Vallier (2009). Elemental Difference : Of Life, Flesh, and Earth in Merleau-Ponty and the Timaeus. In Robert Vallier, Wayne Jeffrey Froman & Bernard Flynn (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy: Transforming the Tradition. State University of New York Press.
Penelope Deutscher (2002). A Politics of Impossible Difference: The Later Work of Luce Irigaray. Cornell University Press.
Rosi Braidotti (2011). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. Columbia University Press.
E. A. Grosz (2005). Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power. Duke University Press.
Cecilia Sjöholm (2000). Crossing Lovers: Luce Irigaray's Elemental Passions. Hypatia 15 (3):92 - 112.
Anne Leeuwen (2013). An Examination of Irigaray's Commitment to Transcendental Phenomenology in The Forgetting of Air and The Way of Love. Hypatia 28 (3):452-468.
Gail Weiss (2006). Sara Heinamaa. 'Toward a Phenomenology of Sexual Difference: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Beauvoir'. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003. [REVIEW] Hypatia 21 (3):194-198.
Cecilia Sjöholm (2000). Crossing Lovers: Luce Irigaray's Elemental Passions. Hypatia 15 (3):92-112.
Chet Meeks (2001). Civil Society and the Sexual Politics of Difference. Sociological Theory 19 (3):325-343.
Douglas Low (1992). The Continuity Between Merleau-Ponty's Early and Late Philosophy of Language. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:287-311.
Emanuela Bianchi (2010). Sexual Topologies in the Aristotelian Cosmos: Revisiting Irigaray's Physics of Sexual Difference. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):373-389.
Ewa Ziarek (2010). Women on the Market": On Sex, Race, and Commodification: Possibilities and Impossibilities of Sexual Difference. In Elena Tzelepis & Athena Athanasiou (eds.), Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and "the Greeks". State University of New York Press.
Susan Kozel (1996). The Diabolical Strategy of Mimesis: Luce Irigaray's Reading of Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Hypatia 11 (3):114-129.
Leonard Lawlor (1998). The End of Phenomenology: Expressionism in Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 31 (1):15-34.
Added to index2011-08-11
Total downloads25 ( #55,680 of 729,711 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,863 of 729,711 )
How can I increase my downloads?