David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 43 (2):411-431 (2008)
We discuss the special place of the Qur'an in the Muslim discourse in general and on science in particular. The Qur'an has an unparalleled influence on the Muslim mind, and understanding the Islamic treatise on science and religion must start from this realization. We explore the concept of science in the Islamic culture and to what extent it can be related to the Qur'an. Reviewing various Islamic discourses on science, we show how a simplistic understanding of the plan to adopt modern science within an Islamic revival program has been corrupted in the form of the theory of "scientific miraculousness of the Qur'an." We assess and dismiss this theory but use it to show how a serious misunderstanding of the nature of modern science and a narrow view of the Qur'an has led to that embarrassingly popular yet misguided theory. We conclude by promoting a multiplicity of readings of the Qur'an and show that this allows for an enlightenment of one's interpretation of Qur'anic verses, using various tools at one's disposal, including scientific knowledge. We uphold Averroes's principle of "no possible conflict," which can be used to persuade the Muslim public of a given idea not by proving that it can be found in the Qur'an but rather by showing that at least some readings of it are fully consistent with the given scientific theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Stefano Bigliardi (2012). Barbour's Typologies and the Contemporary Debate on Islam and Science. Zygon 47 (3):501-519.
Willem B. Drees (2013). Islam and Bioethics in the Context of “Religion and Science”. Zygon 48 (3):732-744.
Willem B. Drees (2010). Who Speaks? Zygon 45 (1):3-6.
Nidhal Guessoum (2010). Religious Literalism and Science-Related Issues in Contemporary Islam. Zygon 45 (4):817-840.
Stefano Bigliardi (2011). Snakes From Staves? Science, Scriptures, and the Supernatural in Maurice Bucaille. Zygon 46 (4):793-805.
Similar books and articles
Reuven Firestone (1996). Conceptions of Holy War in Biblical and Qur'?Nic Tradition. Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):99 - 123.
Fazlur Rahman (1983). Some Key Ethical Concepts of the Qur'ān. Journal of Religious Ethics 11 (2):170 - 185.
Asma Afsaruddin (2009). The Hermeneutics of Inter-Faith Relations: Retrieving Moderation and Pluralism as Universal Principles in Qur'anic Exegeses. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (2):331-354.
Avital Wohlman (2010). Al-Ghazali, Averroës and the Interpretation of the Qur'an: Common Sense and Philosophy in Islam. Routledge.
Jonathan A. C. Brown (2011). Is the Devil in the Details? Tension Between Minimalism and Comprehensiveness in the Shariah. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):458-472.
Rosalind Ward Gwynne (2004). Logic, Rhetoric, and Legal Reasoning in the Qurʼān: God's Arguments. Routledgecurzon.
Bernard Kenneth Freamon, The Emergence of a New Qur'anic Hermeneutic: The Role and Impact of Universities in West and East.
N. Abu-Zayd (2010). The 'Others' in the Qur'an: A Hermeneutical Approach. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (3-4):281-294.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #28,569 of 1,101,770 )
Recent downloads (6 months)37 ( #4,271 of 1,101,770 )
How can I increase my downloads?