David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 11 (1):71-83 (1989)
I present a Third World critique of the trend in American environmentalism known as deep ecology, analyzing each of deep ecology’s central tenets: the distinction between anthropocentrism and biocentrism, the focus on wildemess preservation, the invocation of Eastem traditions, and the belief that it represents the most radical trend within environmentalism. I argue that the anthropocentrism/biocentrism distinction is of little use in understanding the dynamics of environmental degredation, that the implementation of the wildemess agenda is causing serious deprivation in the Third World, that the deep ecologist’s interpretation of Eastem traditions is highly selective, and that in other cultural contexts (e.g., West Germany and India) radical environmentalism manifests itself quite differently, with a far greater emphasis on equity and the integration of ecological concems with livelihood and work. I conclude that despite its claims to universality, deep ecology is firmly rooted in American environmental and cultural history and is inappropriate when applied to the Third World
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard Evanoff (2007). Bioregionalism and Cross-Cultural Dialogue on a Land Ethic. Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (2):141 – 156.
John Hintz (2007). Some Political Problems for Rewilding Nature. Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (2):177 – 216.
Philip Cafaro (2001). For a Grounded Conception of Wilderness and More Wilderness on the Ground. Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):1-17.
Craig DeLancey (2012). An Ecological Concept of Wilderness. Ethics and the Environment 17 (1):25-44.
Christopher J. Preston (2012). Beyond the End of Nature: SRM and Two Tales of Artificity for the Anthropocene. Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (2):188 - 201.
Similar books and articles
Joseph H. Lane Jr & Rebecca R. Clark (2006). The Solitary Walker in the Political World: The Paradoxes of Rousseau and Deep Ecology. Political Theory 34 (1):62 - 94.
Mike Mills & Fraser King (2004). Democracy and Environmentalism : The End of Deep Ecology? - Not Quite. In M. L. J. Wissenburg & Yoram Levy (eds.), Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism: The End of Environmentalism? Routledge.
Robert Frodeman (1992). Radical Environmentalism and the Political Roots of Postmodernism. Environmental Ethics 14 (4):307-319.
Vassos Argyrou (2005). The Logic of Environmentalism: Anthropology, Ecology, and Postcoloniality. Berghahn Books.
Warwick Fox (1989). The Deep Ecology-Ecofeminism Debate and its Parallels. Environmental Ethics 11 (1):5-25.
M. L. J. Wissenburg & Yoram Levy (eds.) (2004). Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism: The End of Environmentalism? Routledge.
Michael E. Zimmerman (1987). Feminism, Depp Ecology, and Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 9 (1):21-44.
Jim Cheney (1989). The Neo-Stoicism of Radical Environmentalism. Environmental Ethics 11 (4):293-325.
Ramachandra Guha (2010). Radical American Environmentalism and Wilderness Preservation : A Third World Critique. In Craig Hanks (ed.), Technology and Values: Essential Readings. Wiley-Blackwell.
David M. Johns (1990). The Relevance of Deep Ecology to the Third World: Some Preliminary Comments. Environmental Ethics 12 (3):233-252.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #38,180 of 1,089,107 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #42,836 of 1,089,107 )
How can I increase my downloads?