Organizational Commitment: A Proposal for a Wider Ethical Conceptualization of ‘Normative Commitment’

Journal of Business Ethics 78 (3):401-414 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conceptualization and measurement of organizational commitment involve different dimensions that include economic, affective, as well as moral aspects labelled in the literature as: ‘continuance’, ‘affective’ and ‘normative’ commitment. This multidimensional framework emerges from the convergence of different research lines. Using Aristotle’s philosophical framework, that explicitly considers the role of the will in human commitment, it is proposed a rational explanation of the existence of mentioned dimensions in organizational commitment. Such a theoretical proposal may offer a more accurate definition of ‘affective commitment’ that distinguishes feelings from rational judgments. The use of a philosophical explanation coherent with psychological findings also allows the discovery of a wider moral concept of ‘normative commitment’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-12

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues.Robert C. Solomon - 1992 - Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (3):317-339.
How virtue fits within business ethics.J. Thomas Whetstone - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):101 - 114.
Loyalty in Business.Domènec Mele - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):11-26.

View all 6 references / Add more references