David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in Practical Philosophy 5 (1):151-157 (2005)
In what manner can philosophy best face world problems? I argue that philosophy's most important contribution to problem solving is not analysis and clarification but synoptic in nature. Relying upon the power of reflection and the scope of imagination as linked to a patient attempt to understand many disciplines, the philosopher ideally seeks to comprehend problems in their many-dimensioned complexity. The disciplines of ecology, evolution, and ethics are especially fruitful in guiding the philosopher seeking to assess the relative worth of things in their emergent inter-relationships. - In the body of the paper I attempt an outline of the outstanding human caused harms, injustices, and instabilities resulting in pain and suffering today. World philosophy today seems sufficiently pluralistic, comprehensive and free of unduly constraining orthodoxies that it can again play a significant role not only in conceptualizing problems but in articulating solutions. Broad visions comparable to Plato's as set forth in the Republic can again be ventured. We need to seek out ways to place into power a council of international philosopher kings and queens offering effective solutions beyond the dictates of partisanship and ideology. I conclude by suggesting five principles that international philosopher kings and queens might be expected to rely upon to bring about a more just global society
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rosamond Kent Sprague (1976). Plato's Philosopher-King: A Study of the Theoretical Background. University of South Carolina Press.
Paul Woodruff (1991). Philosopher Kings: The Argument of Plato's Republic. Ancient Philosophy 11 (1):173-178.
Susan Moller Okin (1977). Philosopher Queens and Private Wives: Plato on Women and the Family. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):345-369.
Jerome P. Schiller (1991). Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato's "Republic" (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (3):483-486.
Thom Brooks (2006). Knowledge and Power in Plato's Political Thought. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):51 – 77.
Michael L. Morgan (1989). Philosopher-Kings. The Argument of Plato's Republic. Review of Metaphysics 43 (2):417-418.
Mary P. Nichols (1984). The Republic's Two Alternatives: Philosopher-Kings and Socrates. Political Theory 12 (2):252-274.
Robin Barrow (1974). Who Are the Philosopher-Kings? Journal of Philosophy of Education 8 (2):200–221.
David Simpson (1996). Administrative Lies and Philosopher-Kings. Philosophical Inquiry 18 (3-4):45-65.
Boris Rankov (1999). D. Braund: Ruling Roman Britain: Kings, Queens, Governors and Emperors From Julius Caesar to Agricola . Pp. Xiv + 217, 35 Figs. London and New York: Routledge, 1996. Cased, £40. ISBN: 0-415-00804-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (02):607-.
Henry G. Wolz (1963). The Protagoras Myth and the Philosopher-Kings. Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):214 - 234.
R. M. Hare (1982). Plato. In R. M. Hare, Jonathan Barnes & Henry Chadwick (eds.), Founders of Thought. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #206,643 of 1,102,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #182,643 of 1,102,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?