Scepticism and absurdity
Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 7 (1-4):163 – 190 (1964)
|Abstract||Analytic rejections of extreme traditional views, especially scepticism, as 'absurd' in some sense of violating 'rules' of discourse, arc considered. References to linguistic and pragmatic rules are discussed and found inadequate as bases for rejecting scepticism. References to logical principles alone are found to lead into scepticism. The claim that epistemology and scepticism take for granted an inadequate theory of words like 'know', or 'knowledge', as descriptive predicates, is considered. Alternatives, construing such words as appraisive or performative, are discussed, but are not found to provide any real escape from the traditional epistemological issues, or from scepticism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Pappas (1999). Berkeley and Scepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):133 - 149.
Ingemund Gullvåg (1964). Scepticism and Absurdity. Inquiry 7 (1-4):163-190.
Jørgen Døør (1973). Scepticism and Dogmatism. Inquiry 16 (1-4):214 – 220.
Jeff Malpas (1994). Self-Knowledge and Scepticism. Erkenntnis 40 (2):165-184.
James Franklin (1994). Scepticism's Health Buoyant. Philosophy 69 (270):503 - 504.
Peter Zinkemagel (1967). A Note on 'Scepticism and Absurdity'. Inquiry 10 (1-4):317-320.
Arne Naess (1966). Psychological and Social Aspects of Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Inquiry 9 (1-4):301 – 321.
Andrew Reisner (2010). Metaethics for Everyone. Problema 4:39-64.
Harald Thorsrud (2009). Ancient Scepticism. University of California Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-03-05
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?