Love – Exploitable Resource or 'No-Lose Situation'? Reconciling Jónasdóttir's Feminist View with Bhaskar's Philosophy of Meta-Reality
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Critical Realism 10 (4):419-441 (2011)
In this article I attempt to reconcile two seemingly conflicting theorisations of love, the one elaborated by Roy Bhaskar as part of his philosophy of meta-Reality and Anna G. Jónasdóttir’s historical materialist-radical feminist theory of love power. While Bhaskar emphasises the essentially non-dual character of love, envisioning it as a ‘no-lose situation’, Jónasdóttir stresses the antagonistic features structuring love relations by conceptualising love as a productive power that men tend to exploit women of. Rather than seeing these accounts as mutually exclusive I show that they can be reconciled by aid of the general ontology elaborated by Bhaskar in his philosophy of meta-Reality.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nel Noddings (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press.
Roy Bhaskar (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Routledge.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roy Bhaskar (2002). Reflections on Meta-Reality: Transcendence, Emancipation, and Everyday Life. Sage Publications.
Roy Bhaskar (2002). Beyond East and West: Spirituality and Comparative Religion in an Age of Global Crisis. Sage Publications.
Anna G. Jónasdóttir (2008). Feminist Questions, Marx's Method and the Theorisation of "Love Power". In Anna G. Jónasdóttir & Kathleen B. Jones (eds.), The Political Interests of Gender Revisited: Redoing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. United Nations University Press
Anna G. Jónasdóttir (1991). Love Power and Political Interests: Towards a Theory of Patriarchy in Contemporary Western Societies. University of Örebro.
Roy Bhaskar (2002). From Science to Emancipation: Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment. Sage Publications.
Roy Bhaskar (2007). The Philosophy of Meta-Reality, Part II: Agency, Perfectability, Novelty. Interview by Mervyn Hartwig. Journal of Critical Realism 1 (1):67-93.
Roy Bhaskar (2007). The Philosophy of Meta-Reality, Part I: Identity, Spirituality, System. Interview by Mervyn Hartwig. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1).
Michael Lacewing (2005). Real Love. The Philosophers' Magazine 29 (29):63-66.
Michalinos Zembylas (2006). Science Education as Emancipatory: The Case of Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy of Meta-Reality. Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (5):665–676.
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Added to index2011-10-08
Total downloads16 ( #188,867 of 1,777,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #205,424 of 1,777,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?