David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):741-759 (2011)
This article presents an approach to understanding human spatial competence that focuses on the representations and processes of spatial cognition and how they are integrated with cognition more generally. The foundational theoretical argument for this research is that spatial information processing is central to cognition more generally, in the sense that it is brought to bear ubiquitously to improve the adaptivity and effectiveness of perception, cognitive processing, and motor action. We describe research spanning multiple levels of complexity to understand both the detailed mechanisms of spatial cognition, and how they are utilized in complex, naturalistic tasks. In the process, we discuss the critical role of cognitive architectures in developing a consistent account that spans this breadth, and we note some areas in which the current version of a popular architecture, ACT-R, may need to be augmented. Finally, we suggest a framework for understanding the representations and processes of spatial competence and their role in human cognition generally
|Keywords||Spatial cognition Computational model Orientation Spatial visualization Cognitive architecture Reference frames|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Lera Boroditsky (2000). Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time Through Spatial Metaphors. Cognition 75 (1):1-28.
Neil Burgess (2006). Spatial Memory: How Egocentric and Allocentric Combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (12):551-557.
Janice Glasgow & Dimitri Papadias (1992). Computational Imagery. Cognitive Science 16 (3):355-394.
Glenn Gunzelmann (2008). Strategy Generalization Across Orientation Tasks: Testing a Computational Cognitive Model. Cognitive Science 32 (5):835-861.
Tom Hartley, Iris Trinkler & Neil Burgess (2004). Geometric Determinants of Human Spatial Memory. Cognition 94 (1):39-75.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Glenn Gunzelmann (2011). Introduction to the Topic on Modeling Spatial Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):628-631.
Neha Khetrapal (2010). What is Special About Body Based Reference Frame? Human Studies 33 (2):221-227.
Gottfried Vosgerau (2007). Conceptuality in Spatial Representations. Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):349 – 365.
Madeleine Keehner (2011). Spatial Cognition Through the Keyhole: How Studying a Real-World Domain Can Inform Basic Science—and Vice Versa. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):632-647.
Holger Schultheis & Thomas Barkowsky (2011). Casimir: An Architecture for Mental Spatial Knowledge Processing. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):778-795.
Scott D. Lathrop, Samuel Wintermute & John E. Laird (2011). Exploring the Functional Advantages of Spatial and Visual Cognition From an Architectural Perspective. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):796-818.
S. Grossberg (1999). The Link Between Brain Learning, Attention, and Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):1-44.
Athanassios Raftopoulos (2006). Defending Realism on the Proper Ground. Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):47-77.
Elżbieta Łukasiewicz (2010). Husserl's Lebenswelt and the Problem of Spatial Cognition – in Search of Universals. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):23-43.
Charles Q. Wu (1997). Complementarity in Vision and Cognition. Philosophical Psychology 10 (4):481 – 488.
Ivar Hagendoorn (2012). Inscribing the Body, Exscribing Space. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (1):69-78.
David J. Chalmers, Robert M. French & Douglas R. Hofstadter (1992). High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy:A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intellige 4 (3):185 - 211.
Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson (2006). Cognition Needs Syntax but Not Rules. In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing. 147--158.
Ronald N. Giere (2012). Scientific Cognition: Human Centered but Not Human Bound. Philosophical Explorations 15 (2):199 - 206.
Added to index2011-08-05
Total downloads12 ( #128,032 of 1,101,116 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,950 of 1,101,116 )
How can I increase my downloads?