To give and to give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):543-559 (2004)
| Abstract | The transfer of food among group members is a ubiquitous feature of small-scale forager and forager-agricultural populations. The uniqueness of pervasive sharing among humans, especially among unrelated individuals, has led researchers to evaluate numerous hypotheses about the adaptive functions and patterns of sharing in different ecologies. This article attempts to organize available cross-cultural evidence pertaining to several contentious evolutionary models: kin selection, reciprocal altruism, tolerated scrounging, and costly signaling. Debates about the relevance of these models focus primarily on the extent to which individuals exert control over the distribution of foods they acquire, and the extent to which donors receive food or other fitness-enhancing benefits in return for shares given away. Each model can explain some of the variance in sharing patterns within groups, and so generalizations that ignore or deny the importance of any one model may be misleading. Careful multivariate analyses and cross-cultural comparisons of food transfer patterns are therefore necessary tools for assessing aspects of the sexual division of labor, human life history evolution, and the evolution of the family. This article also introduces a framework for better understanding variation in sharing behavior across small-scale traditional societies. I discuss the importance of resource ecology and the degree of coordination in acquisition activities as a key feature that influences sharing behavior. Key Words: behavioral ecology; cooperation; costly signaling; food sharing; foragers; reciprocal altruism. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRaymond Hames (2004). The Purpose of Exchange Helps Shape the Mode of Exchange. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):564-565.
Jim Moore (2004). The History of Human Food Transfers: Tinbergen's Other Question. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):566-567.
Michael Gurven (2004). Tolerated Reciprocity, Reciprocal Scrounging, and Unrelated Kin: MaKing Sense of Multiple Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):572-579.
Margaret Franzen (2004). Key Variables in Tests of Food Sharing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):563-563.
Gillian R. Brown (2004). Tolerated Scrounging in Nonhuman Primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):562-563.
John Ziker (2004). Nonmarket Cooperation in the Indigenous Food Economy of Taimyr, Arctic Russia: Evidence for Control and Benefit. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):571-571.
Jeffrey R. Stevens & Fiery A. Cushman (2004). Cognitive Constraints on Reciprocity and Tolerated Scrounging. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):569-570.
Richard Sosis (2004). Insights From Ifaluk: Food Sharing Among Cooperative Fishers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):568-569.
Amotz Zahavi (2004). The Details of Food-Sharing Interactions – Their Cost in Social Prestige. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):570-571.
Thomas Getty (2004). A Kind Man Benefits Himself – but How? Evolutionary Models of Human Food Sharing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):563-564.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #115,524 of 556,896 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,896 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
