Philippe et la surprise d'Élatée
33 (1):526-546 (1909)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRoberto Casati & Elena Pasquinelli (2007). How Can You Be Surprised? The Case for Volatile Expectations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2).
Elliott Sober (1998). To Give a Surprise Exam, Use Game Theory. Synthese 115 (3):355-373.
Joseph Y. Halpern & Yoram Moses (1986). Taken by Surprise: The Paradox of the Surprise Test Revisited. Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (3):281 - 304.
Michael Winterbottom (1974). Surprise, Surprise Gianna Petrone: La Battuta a Sorpresa Negli Oratori Latini. Pp. 129. Palermo: Palumbo, 1971. Paper, L. 1,800. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 24 (02):218-219.
Daniel C. Dennett (2001). Surprise, Surprise. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):982-982.
Ken Levy (2009). The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
