David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (01):87-110 (1995)
Moral disagreement about public policies—issues such as abortion, affirmative action, and health care—is a prominent feature of contemporary American democracy. Yet it is not a central concern of the leading theories of democracy. The two dominant democratic approaches in our time—procedural democracy and constitutional democracy—fail to offer adequate responses to the problem of moral disagreement. Both suggest some elements that are necessary in any adequate response, but neither one alone nor both together are sufficient. We argue here that an adequate conception of democracy must make moral deliberation an essential part of the political process. What we call “deliberative democracy” adds an important dimension to the theory and practice of politics that the leading conceptions of democracy neglect
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tim Heysse (2006). Consensus and Power in Deliberative Democracy. Inquiry 49 (3):265 – 289.
Similar books and articles
Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson (2000). Why Deliberative Democracy is Different. Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (01):161-.
William A. Galston (1998). Book Review:Democracy and Disagreement. Amy Gutmann, Dennis Thompson. [REVIEW] Ethics 108 (3):607-.
Amy Gutmann (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Stephen Macedo (ed.) (1999). Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
Jason Decker & Daniel Groll (2013). The (In)Significance of Moral Disagreement for Moral Knowledge. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 8. Oxford.
John K. Davis (2010). An Alternative to Relativism. Philosophical Topics 38 (2):17-37.
David Enoch (2009). How is Moral Disagreement a Problem for Realism? Journal of Ethics 13 (1):15 - 50.
Ralph Wedgwood (2010). The Moral Evil Demons. In Richard Feldman & Ted Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
Sarah McGrath (2007). Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics Vol. 4. Oxford University Press. 87-108.
Ranjoo Seodu Herr (2008). Cultural Claims and the Limits of Liberal Democracy. Social Theory and Practice 34 (1):25-48.
Joseph Boyle (1994). Radical Moral Disagreement in Contemporary Health Care: A Roman Catholic Perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (2):183-200.
Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson (2002). Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process. Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):153–174.
Folke Tersman (2006). Moral Disagreement. Cambridge University Press.
Gregory Brazeal (2011). Webs of Faith as a Source of Reasonable Disagreement. Critical Review 23 (4):421-448.
Added to index2012-04-18
Total downloads12 ( #141,829 of 1,413,475 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,935 of 1,413,475 )
How can I increase my downloads?