Dependent beauty revisited: A reply to Wicks

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,232
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Nick Zangwill (2001). Formal Natural Beauty. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):209–224.
Robert Wicks (1995). Kant on Fine Art: Artistic Sublimity Shaped by Beauty. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):189-193.
Roger Scruton (2009). Beauty. Oxford University Press.
Robert Wicks (1997). Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (4):387-400.
Nick Zangwill (2003). Beauty. In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Oxford Companion to Aesthetics. Oxford University Press
Paul Guyer (1995). Beauty, Sublimity, and Expression: Reply to Wicks and Cantrick. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):194-195.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

18 ( #141,475 of 1,699,689 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #206,271 of 1,699,689 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.