Dependent beauty revisited: A reply to Wicks

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    Nick Zangwill (2001). Formal Natural Beauty. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):209–224.
    Robert Wicks (1995). Kant on Fine Art: Artistic Sublimity Shaped by Beauty. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):189-193.
    Roger Scruton (2009). Beauty. Oxford University Press.
    Robert Wicks (1997). Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (4):387-400.
    Nick Zangwill (2003). Beauty. In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Oxford Companion to Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
    Paul Guyer (1995). Beauty, Sublimity, and Expression: Reply to Wicks and Cantrick. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):194-195.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    9 ( #128,885 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,722 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.