Dependent beauty revisited: A reply to Wicks
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):357-361 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNick Zangwill (2001). Formal Natural Beauty. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):209–224.
Robert Wicks (1995). Kant on Fine Art: Artistic Sublimity Shaped by Beauty. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):189-193.
Robert Wicks (2009). Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):884-887.
Roger Scruton (2009). Beauty. Oxford University Press.
Robert Wicks (2008). Natural Beauty and Optimism in Schopenhauer's Aesthetics. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):273-291.
Philip Mallaband (2002). Understanding Kant's Distinction Between Free and Dependent Beauty. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):66-81.
Robert Wicks (1997). Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (4):387-400.
Robert Wicks (1999). Can Tattooed Faces Be Beautiful?: Limits on the Restriction of Forms in Dependent Beauty. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):361-363.
Nick Zangwill (2003). Beauty. In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Oxford Companion to Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Paul Guyer (1995). Beauty, Sublimity, and Expression: Reply to Wicks and Cantrick. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):194-195.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,014 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
