David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kantian Review 7 (1):1-37 (2003)
Is the refutation of scepticism a central objective for Kant? Some commentators have denied that the refutation of either theoretical or moral scepticism was central to Kant's concerns. Thus, in his recent book Kant and the Fate of Autonomy, Karl Ameriks rejects 'taking Kant to be basically a respondent to the skeptic'. According to Ameriks, who here has Kant's theoretical philosophy in mind,What Kant goes on to propose is that, instead of focusing on trying to establish with certainty – against skepticism – that the objects of common sense exist, let alone that they have philosophical dominance, or, in contrast, on explaining that it is only the theoretical discoveries of science that determine what is objective, one can rather work primarily to determine a positive and balanced philosophical relation between the distinct frameworks of our manifest and scientific images
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Immanuel Kant (1996). Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2007). Critique of Pure Reason. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 449-451.
Karl Ameriks (1981). Kant's Deduction of Freedom and Morality. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (1):53-79.
Rae Langton (1998). Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford University Press.
John Rawls (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Brian A. Chance (2012). Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):311-331.
Martin Sticker (2015). The Moral-Psychology of the Common Agent – A Reply to Ido Geiger. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (5):976-989.
Similar books and articles
Kurt Mosser (2009). Kant and Wittgenstein: Common Sense, Therapy, and the Critical Philosophy. Philosophia 37 (1):1-20.
James W. Cornman (1975). Perception, Common Sense And Science. Yale University Press.
Wai-hung Wong (2002). The Problem of Insulation. Philosophy 77 (3):349-373.
Annalisa Coliva (2010). Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, Certainty, and Common Sense. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jesper Kallestrup (2005). Contextualism Between Scepticism and Common-Sense. Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):247-266.
David Thomas (1978). Sociology and Common Sense. Inquiry 21 (1-4):1 – 32.
R. I. Aaron (1958). The Common Sense View of Sense-Perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:1-14.
Michael De Medeiros (2010). Common Sense. Weigl Publishers.
Brian Grant (2001). The Virtues of Common Sense. Philosophy 76 (2):191-209.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #113,666 of 1,926,181 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #149,482 of 1,926,181 )
How can I increase my downloads?