David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):483-494 (2008)
Contrary to both his own intentions and the views of both older and more recent commentators. I argue that Kant's aesthetics remains within the confines of eighteenth-century aesthetics as a branch of empirical psychology, as it was then practiced. Kant established a plausible connection between aesthetic experience and judgment on the one hand and cognition in general on the other, through his explanatory concept of the free play of our cognitive powers. However, there is nothing distinctly 'a priori' or 'transcendental' in his claim that this state of mind is what causes our pleasure in beauty or other aesthetic properties. Nor did Kant establish a genuinely a priori or transcendental principle that all human beings have the same disposition to experience a free play of their cognitive powers, let alone in response to the same objects. This failure, however, in no way limits the continuing significance of Kant's aesthetic theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ernst Cassirer (1951/1955). The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Boston, Beacon Press.
Donald Davidson (1973). Radical Interpretation. Dialectica 27 (1):314-328.
Paul Guyer (1994). Kant's Conception of Fine Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (3):275-285.
Paul Guyer (2006). The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited. In Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
David Hume (1903). Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
Alessia Pannese (2012). A Gray Matter of Taste: Sound Perception, Music Cognition, and Baumgarten's Aesthetics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (3):594-601.
Similar books and articles
Paul Guyer & Henry E. Allison (2006). Dialogue: Paul Guyer and Henry Allison on Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste. In Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Susanne Herrmann-Sinai (2009). Musik und Zeit bei Kant. Kant-Studien 100 (4):427-453.
Paul Guyer (1992). Thomson's Problems with Kant: A Comment on "Kant's Problems with Ugliness". Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (4):317-319.
Paul Guyer (2007). Free Play and True Well-Being: Herder's Critique of Kant's Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):353–368.
Paul Guyer (2006). Kant. Routledge.
Paul Guyer (1990). Feeling and Freedom: Kant on Aesthetics and Morality. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (2):137-146.
Paul Guyer (1978). Disinterestedness and Desire in Kant's Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):449-460.
Paul Guyer (1993). Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Guyer (1997). Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #49,867 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #113,990 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?