Ratio Juris 20 (1):1-31 (2007)
|Abstract||In 1880, when Oliver Wendell Holmes (later to be a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) criticized the logical theology of law articulated by Christopher Columbus Langdell (the first Dean of Harvard Law School), neither Holmes nor Langdell was aware of the revolution in logic that had begun, the year before, with Frege's Begriffsschrift. But there is an important element of truth in Holmes's insistence that a legal system cannot be adequately understood as a system of axioms and corollaries; and this element of truth is not obviated by the more powerful logical techniques that are now available.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michel van de Kerchove (1993). The Legal System Between Order and Disorder. Oxford University Press.
John Gardner (2012). How Law Claims, What Law Claims. In Matthias Klatt (ed.), Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press.
Susan Haack (2004). Epistemology Legalized: Or, Truth, Justice, and the American Way. American Journal of Jurisprudence 49:43-61.
Susan Haack (2008). Of Truth, in Science and in Law. Brooklyn Law Review 73 (2).
Burkhard Tuschling (1988). Consistency and Contradiction. Philosophy and Theology 2 (4):327-361.
Morris Raphael Cohen (1951). Readings in Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy. New York, Prentice-Hall.
Susan Haack (2008). The Pluralistic Universe of Law: Towards a Neo-Classical Legal Pragmatism. Ratio Juris 21 (4):453-480.
Robert S. Summers (1984). Lon L. Fuller. Stanford University Press.
Susan Haack (2005). On Legal Pragmatism: Where Does 'the Path of the Law' Lead Us? American Journal of Jurisprudence 50:71-105.
Steven J. Burton (ed.) (2000). The Path of the Law and its Influence: The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #51,675 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?