David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Episteme 5 (3):pp. 253-265 (2008)
The epistemological analysis offered in this paper reveals that a combination of pieces of evidence, none of them sufficient by itself to warrant a causal conclusion to the legally required degree of proof, may do so jointly. The legal analysis offered here, interlocking with this, reveals that Daubert’s requirement that courts screen each item of scientific expert testimony for reliability can actually impede the process of arriving at the conclusion most warranted by the evidence proffered
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Maynard Keynes (1921/2004). A Treatise on Probability. Dover Publications.
A. Bird (2003). Defending Science--Within Reason Between Scientism and Cynicism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Richard von Mises (1941). Probability, Statistics and Truth. Philosophical Review 50 (1):81-82.
Petr Skrabanek & James McCormick (1991). [Book Review] Follies and Fallacies in Medicine. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Ethics 17:110-111.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nancy Cartwright (2006). Well‐Ordered Science: Evidence for Use. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):981-990.
Frederick Schauer (2008). In Defense of Rule-Based Evidence Law – and Epistemology Too. Episteme 5 (3):pp. 295-305.
Susan Haack (2008). Of Truth, in Science and in Law. Brooklyn Law Review 73 (2).
Alex Stein (2005). Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford University Press.
Catherine Z. Elgin (2002). Take It From Me. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):291-308.
Yuval Avnur (2011). An Old Problem for the New Rationalism. Synthese 183 (2):175-185.
Catherine Z. Elgin (2002). Take It From Me: The Epistemological Status of Testimony. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):291-308.
Simon A. Cole, Toward Evidence-Based Evidence: Supporting Forensic Knowledge Claims in the Post-Daubert Era.
Susan Haack (2008). Proving Causation: The Holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert. Journal of Health and Biomedical Law 4:253-289.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #68,426 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?