Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Semantics 29 (2):145-206 (2012)
|Abstract||Quantifiers, unlike proper names or definite descriptions, cannot be given the semantics of referring expressions. This fact has triggered a long-standing debate in formal semantics and syntax as to the combinatorial means by which quantifiers are integrated into a sentence. The present paper contributes to this debate through an investigation of quantifier comprehension during real-time sentence processing. We present evidence showing that two potentially independent processes—the integration of a quantifier in object position and the resolution of antecedent-contained deletion (ACD)—are linked. Our data show, more specifically, that the resolution of a downstream ACD site is facilitated during real-time sentence processing if the upstream DP hosting the ACD site is quantificational but not if it is definite. We discuss these findings in the context of a QUANTIFIER RAISING-based approach and a type-shifting-based approach to quantifier integration. We argue that facilitation of ACD resolution by an upstream quantifier is only expected by theories, such as the QUANTIFIER RAISING approach, which employ the same mechanism for both processes. We then compare the QUANTIFIER RAISING-based account with a non-grammatical experience-based approach to our data, which attempts to explain the findings in terms of corpus frequencies. Although we cannot rule out such an alternative at this stage, we offer reasons to believe that an account that exploits QUANTIFIER RAISING has an explanatory advantage|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. Szabolcsi (2013). Quantification and ACD: What is the Evidence From Real-Time Processing Evidence For? A Response to Hackl Et Al. (2012). Journal of Semantics:ffs025.
Martin J. Pickering (2000). No Evidence for Traces in Sentence Comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):47-48.
Yung-Chi Sung & Da-Lun Tang (2007). Unconscious Processing Embedded in Conscious Processing: Evidence From Gaze Time on Chinese Sentence Reading. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2):339-348.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1981). Bound Variables and Schematic Letters. Logique Et Analyse 95:425-429.
David Pereplyotchik (2011). Psychological and Computational Models of Language Comprehension. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (31):31-72.
D. H. Mellor (1998). Real Time Ii. Routledge.
Mark Textor (2005). Truth Via Sentential Quantification. Dialogue 44 (3):539-550.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1994). Quantifying Over the Reals. Synthese 101 (1):53 - 64.
Herman H. J. Kolk & Robert J. Hartsuiker (2000). Agrammatic Sentence Processing: Severity, Complexity, and Priming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):39-40.
Michael Spivey, Mark Andrews & Daniel Richardson (1999). On Computational and Behavioral Evidence Regarding Hebbian Transcortical Cell Assemblies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):302-302.
Ruth M. Kempson & Annabel Cormack (1981). Ambiguity and Quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):259 - 309.
Added to index2012-01-10
Total downloads9 ( #122,430 of 730,103 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 730,103 )
How can I increase my downloads?