The inverse gambler's fallacy: The argument from design. The anthropic principle applied to Wheeler universes
Mind 96 (383):331-340 (1987)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNeil A. Manson (2009). The Fine-Tuning Argument. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Cory Juhl (2005). Finetuning, Many Worlds, and the 'Inverse Gambler's Fallacy'. Noûs 39 (2):337–347.
John Leslie (1988). No Inverse Gambler's Fallacy in Cosmology. Mind 97 (386):269-272.
P. J. McGrath (1988). The Inverse Gambler's Fallacy and Cosmology--A Reply to Hacking. Mind 97 (386):265-268.
Darren Bradley (2009). Multiple Universes and Observation Selection Effects. American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):72.
Darren Bradley (2009). Multiple Universes and Observation Selection Effects. American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):2009.
John Leslie (1986). Anthropic Explanations in Cosmology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:87 - 95.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads101 ( #6,024 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,152 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
