The Snowbird Charrette: Integrative Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Environmental Research Design
Minerva 47 (4):407-440 (2009)
|Abstract||The integration of ideas, methods, and data from diverse disciplines has been a transformative force in science and higher education, attracting policy interventions, program innovations, financial resources, and talented people. Much energy has been invested in producing a new generation of scientists trained to work fluidly across disciplines, sectors, and research problems, yet the success of such investments has been difficult to measure. Using the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) program of the U.S. National Science Foundation as a strategic research site, we conducted an experiment to determine whether and how the process and products of research of IGERT-trained scientists differ from those of scientists trained in disciplinary graduate programs. Among scientists in the early years of graduate study we found substantial and consistent differences suggesting that interdisciplinary training improved the quality and process of research, but this pattern was equally strongly reversed among students in the latter years of graduate study. Using systematic observation and other data we suggest why this might be so, then discuss the implications of these results for the design and conduct of graduate education and research.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward J. Hackett (2002). Four Observations About “Six Domains of Research Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2).
Robert Frodeman (2008). Redefining Ecological Ethics: Science, Policy, and Philosophy at Cape Horn. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4).
M. Peiffer Ann, E. Hugenschmidt Christina & J. Laurienti Paul (forthcoming). Ethics in 15 Min Per Week. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Ann Peiffer, Christina Hugenschmidt & Paul Laurienti (forthcoming). Ethics in 15 Min Per Week. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Fenna van Nes (2011). Mathematics Education and Neurosciences: Towards Interdisciplinary Insights Into the Development of Young Children's Mathematical Abilities. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):75-80.
Cynthia D. Rittenhouse (1996). Survival Skills and Ethics Training for Graduate Students: A Graduate Student Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3).
Klaus Mainzer (2011). Interdisciplinarity and Innovation Dynamics. On Convergence of Research, Technology, Economy, and Society. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (4):275-289.
Mansoor Niaz (2008). A Rationale for Mixed Methods (Integrative) Research Programmes in Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (2):287-305.
Taran Thune (2010). The Training of “Triple Helix Workers”? Doctoral Students in University–Industry–Government Collaborations. Minerva 48 (4):463-483.
Mathieu Albert, Suzanne Laberge & Brian Hodges (2009). Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists' Perceptions of Social Science Research. Minerva 47 (2):171-194.
Michael Kalichman & Sarah Brown (1998). Effects of Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Survey of Graduate Students in Experimental Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (4):487-498.
Leslie R. Sims (2001). “Sherry's Secret”. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):147-150.
Daniel A. Griffith (2008). Ethical Considerations in Geographic Research: What Especially Graduate Students Need to Know. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):237 – 252.
Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy & Marília Morosini (eds.) (2007). Innovation and Interdisciplinarity in the University =. Edipucrs.
Jessica Li & Shengli Fu (2012). A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):339-349.
Added to index2010-12-11
Total downloads9 ( #114,014 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?