David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):147-174 (2012)
I critically discuss two claims which Hannah Ginsborg makes on behalf of her account of meaning in terms of ‘primitive normativity’(2011; 2012): first, that it avoids the sceptical regress articulated by Kripke's Wittgenstein; second, that it makes sense of the thought—central to Kripke's Wittgenstein—that ‘meaning is normative’, in a way which shows this thought not only to be immune from recent criticisms but also to undermine reductively naturalistic theories of content. In the course of the discussion, I consider and attempt to shed light on a number of issues: the structure of the sceptical regress; the content of the thought that ‘meaning is normative’, and its force against reductive theories; the connection between meaning and justification; and the notion of ‘primitive normativity’
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Simon W. Blackburn (1984). The Individual Strikes Back. Synthese 58 (March):281-302.
Paul A. Boghossian (2003). The Normativity of Content. Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.
Paul A. Boghossian (1989). The Rule-Following Considerations. Mind 98 (392):507-49.
Jason Bridges (2014). Rule-Following Skepticism, Properly So Called. In Andrea Kern & James Conant (eds.), Varieties of Skepticism: Essays After Kant, Wittgenstein, and Cavell. De Gruyter. 249-288.
Donald Davidson (1963). Actions, Reasons, and Causes. Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685-700.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hannah Ginsborg (2011). Primitive Normativity and Skepticism About Rules. Journal of Philosophy 108 (5):227-254.
Hannah Ginsborg (2011). Inside and Outside Language: Stroud's Nonreductionism About Meaning. In Jason Bridges, Niko Kolodny & Wai-Hung Wong (eds.), The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Essays for Barry Stroud. Oxford University Press.
Allan Gibbard (1994). Meaning and Normativity. Philosophical Issues 5:95-115.
Karim Dharamsi (2008). From Norms to Uses and Back Again. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):167-184.
Anthony Dardis (1994). How the Radically Interpreted Make Mistakes. Dialogue 33 (03):415-.
Martin Montminy (2005). Meaning Skepticism and Normativity. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:215-235.
Hannah Ginsborg (2011). Review of Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content, by Anandi Hattiangadi. [REVIEW] Mind 119 (476):1175-1186.
Hannah Ginsborg (2012). Meaning, Understanding and Normativity. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):127-146.
Alan Millar (2002). The Normativity of Meaning. In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Philosophical Studies. Cambridge University Press. 57-73.
Daniel Whiting (2007). The Normativity of Meaning Defended. Analysis 67 (294):133–140.
Daniel Whiting (2009). On Epistemic Conceptions of Meaning: Use, Meaning and Normativity. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):416-434.
Asa Maria Wikforss (2001). Semantic Normativity. Philosophical Studies 102 (2):203-26.
Josefa Toribio (1999). Meaning, Dispositions, and Normativity. Minds and Machines 9 (3):399-413.
Adolf Rami (2005). Über Die Sogenannte Normativität der Bedeutung. Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):81-117.
Added to index2012-05-16
Total downloads43 ( #55,310 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #247,412 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?