Using and abusing others: A reply to Machan
Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3) (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesE. Paavilainen, P. Å & M. Paunonen (1998). Ethical Problems in Research on Families Who Are Abusing Children. Nursing Ethics 5 (3):200-205.
Antony Flew (1982). The Paradigm Case Argument: Abusing and Not Using the PCA. Journal of Philosophy of Education 16 (1):115–121.
Charles F. Kielkopf (1985). Abusing Science. The New Scholasticism 59 (1):110-118.
Tibor R. Machan (2000). Initiative: Human Agency and Society. Hoover Institution Press.
Alan Haworth (1989). Capitalism, Freedom and Rhetoric: A Reply to Tibor R. Machan. Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (1):97-108.
Tibor R. Machan (1992). The Right to Private Property: Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 6 (1):97-106.
Tibor R. Machan (2001). Sterba on Machan's "Concession". Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (2):241–243.
Earl W. Spurgin (2006). Occupational Safety and Paternalism: Machan Revisited. Journal of Business Ethics 63 (2):155 - 173.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #87,931 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
