Webers idealtypus AlS methode zur bestimmung Des begriffsinhaltes theoretischer begriffe in den kulturwissenschaften
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (2):275 - 296 (1997)
Weber's Ideal Type as a Method of Forming the Content of Theoretical Concepts in Social Sciences}. Max Weber introduced the ideal type as the specific method of concept formation in social sciences. But the ideal type is not established in social research. Instead, authors in philosophy of science until today try to reconstruct and interpret what Weber said about ideal types as well as what might be their importance in Weber's social theory. The thesis of the following paper is that the difficulties in understanding Weber's ideal types are linked with Weber's intensional logic of concept formation. The thesis is defended in three steps. The first step deals with Weber's understanding of what is a scientific question in cultural sciences. Secondly Weber's critical arguments against positivism, hegelianism and historism are worked out. Thirdly, Weber's method of concept formation is reconstructed.
|Keywords||ideal type intensional logic Max Weber qualitative methods in social research|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kurt H. Wolff (1980). Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws, and Ideal Types. Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (1):103-106.
Guy Oakes (1988). Rickert's Value Theory and the Foundations of Weber's Methodology. Sociological Theory 6 (1):38-51.
Hans Henrik Bruun (2008). Objectivity, Value Spheres, and "Inherent Laws": On Some Suggestive Isomorphisms Between Weber, Bourdieu, and Luhmann. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):97-120.
M. R. (2001). The Ontology of the Questionnaire - Max Weber on Measurement and Mass Investigation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):647-684.
Frederic Vandenberghe (1999). Simmel and Weber as Ideal-Typical Founders of Sociology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):57-80.
W. G. Runciman (1972). A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.
Giovanni Camardi (2004). Ideal Types and Scientific Theories. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):273-285.
H. Aronovitch (2012). Interpreting Weber's Ideal-Types. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):356-369.
Asaf Kedar (2007). Ideal Types as Hermeneutic Concepts. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):318-345.
John Drysdale (1996). How Are Social-Scientific Concepts Formed? A Reconstruction of Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation. Sociological Theory 14 (1):71-88.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #163,661 of 1,100,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,144 of 1,100,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?