Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law
Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3) (2000)
| Abstract | Dialogues and dialectics have come to playan important role in the field of ArtificialIntelligence and Law. This paper describes thelegal-theoretical and logical background of this role,and discusses the different services into whichdialogues are put. These services include:characterising logical operators, modelling thedefeasibility of legal reasoning, providing the basisfor legal justification and identifying legal issues,and establishing the law in concrete cases. Specialattention is given to the requirements oflaw-establishing dialogues. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJaap Hage (1996). A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):199-273.
Bart Verheij (2000). Henry Prakken (1997). Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (1).
Jaap Hage (2003). Law and Defeasibility. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):221-243.
Ronald P. Loui (2001). Jaap Hage, Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and its Underlying Logic. Law and Philosophy Library. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (4).
Harm Kloosterhuis (2000). Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3).
Peter Wahlgren (1992). Automation of Legal Reasoning: A Study on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
H. Prakken & G. Sartor (1996). A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):331-368.
Henry Prakken (2008). Formalising Ordinary Legal Disputes: A Case Study. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):333-359.
Trevor Bench-Capon (1997). Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4).
Eveline Feteris & Henry Prakken (2000). Introduction: Dialectical Legal Argument: Formal and Informal Models. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #203,804 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
