Graduate studies at Western
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (3):259-267 (2009)
|Abstract||Loop quantum gravity predicts that spatial geometry is fundamentally discrete. Whether this discreteness entails a departure from exact Lorentz symmetry is a matter of dispute that has generated an interesting methodological dilemma. On one hand one would like the theory to agree with current experiments, but, so far, tests in the highest energies we can manage show no such sign of departure. On the other hand one would like the theory to yield testable predictions, and deformations of exact Lorentz symmetry in certain yet– to–be–tested regimes may have phenomenological consequences. Exposing their shortcomings, here I discuss two arguments that exemplify this dilemma, and compare them to other cases from the history of physics that share their symptoms.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nick Huggett & Craig Callender (2001). Why Quantize Gravity (or Any Other Field for That Matter)? Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S382-.
Henrik Zinkernagel (2006). The Philosophy Behind Quantum Gravity. Theoria 21 (3):295-312.
Desmond Alan Ford, Quantum Gravity: Time is the Red Herring and Classical Mathematics is the Elephant in the Room.
James Mattingly (2009). Mongrel Gravity. Erkenntnis 70 (3):379 - 395.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #42,047 of 739,080 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,080 )
How can I increase my downloads?