David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107 (1993)
In a paper, “Is there a Single True Morality,” Gilbert Harman presents an argument for moral relativism that some have found persuasive. Relativism is, Harman argues, the view that is most compatible with a scientific view of the world. The present paper argues that Harman’s argument is unsound since it contains at least one false premise. Further, there are considerations to which Harman himself draws attention which count against moral relativism and in favor of moral absolutism i.e., the view that actions have a moral character that is independent of how individuals or groups think or feel about them.Nor is moral absolutism incompatible with a scientific view of the world, although it is no doubt incompatible with the radical empiricsm that underlies Harman’s argument
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William L. Langenfus (1988). A Problem for Harman's Moral Relativism. Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
Charles Sayward (1988). System Relativism. Ratio 1 (2):163-175.
Gilbert Harman (2000). Explaining Value and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Graham Mark Long (2004). Relativism and the Foundations of Liberalism. Imprint Academic.
Nathan Nobis (2002). Who Needs the ’Actual Futures Pr/Nciple’?: Harmon on Abortion. Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):55-63.
Guy Axtell (1993). Naturalism, Normativity, and Explanation: The Scientistic Biases of Contemporary Naturalism. Metaphilosophy 24 (3):253-274.
William S. Robinson (1998). Intrinsic Qualities of Experience: Surviving Harman's Critique. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 47 (3):285-309.
Rob Lovering (2011). The Ever Conscious View: A Critique. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):90-101.
Berit Brogaard (2012). Moral Relativism and Moral Expressivism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):538-556.
Paul Boghossian (2006). What is Relativism? In Patrick Greenough & Michael Lynch (eds.), Truth and Relativism. Clarendon Press. 13--37.
Gilbert Harman (1975). Moral Relativism Defended. Philosophical Review 84 (1):3-22.
Henning Jensen (1976). Gilbert Harman's Defense of Moral Relativism. Philosophical Studies 30 (6):401 - 407.
Louis P. Pojman (1990). Gilbert Harman's Internalist Moral Relativism. Modern Schoolman 68 (1):19-39.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads8 ( #199,368 of 1,692,629 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #75,732 of 1,692,629 )
How can I increase my downloads?