David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 22 (1):1-14 (2012)
This article analyzes the source of Confucian universal morality and human dignity from the perspective of the classic saying, ?what follows the dao is good, and what dao forms is nature? (jishan chengxing) found in the Great Commentaries of the Book of Changes. From a Classical Confucian perspective, human nature is generated by the natural dao of tian, so human dignity and morality also emerge from the natural dao of tian. This article discusses the relationship between the Confucian dao of tian and the moral notion of human rights which ensues from the historical tradition of Chinese exegesis on this subject. Specifically, the authors reconstruct a naturalist version of Confucian morality which inherently motivates the beneficial outcomes generally associated with the modern Western conception of human rights. The authors argue that such a framework, which would draw upon Confucian ?natural goodness within human nature? differs significantly from the more commonly accepted Mencian version of human morality dependent upon the premise that ?human nature is good?. This intra-mural differentiation within Chinese philosophy can be helpful in structuring dialogue with various Western theories of human rights
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
G. E. Moore (1903/2004). Principia Ethica. Dover Publications.
Xianglong Zhang (2009). The Philosophical Feature of Confucianism and its Position in Inter-Cultural Dialogue: Universalism or Non-Universalism? [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):483-492.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Haiming Wen & William Keli’I. Akina (2012). Human Rights Ideology as Endemic in Chinese Philosophy: Classical Confucian and Mohist Perspectives. Asian Philosophy 22 (4):387-413.
Qingjie James Wang (1999). The Golden Rule and Interpersonal Care: From a Confucian Perspective. Philosophy East and West 49 (4):415-438.
Chenggui Li (2006). Three Sources of Wisdom of Chinese Traditional Virtue and a Contemporary Examination. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):341-365.
Katrin Froese (2008). The Art of Becoming Human: Morality in Kant and Confucius. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (3):257-268.
Julia Tao Lai Po Wah (2007). Dignity in Long-Term Care for Older Persons: A Confucian Perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):465 – 481.
Adam D. Bailey & Alan Strudler (2011). Dialogue - The Confucian Critique of Rights-Based Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (4):661-677.
Adam D. Bailey & Alan Strudler (2011). Dialogue. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (4):661-677.
Clark Butler (2002). Human Rights. Philo 5 (1):5-22.
Roger Trigg (2005). Morality Matters. Blackwell Pub..
Gad C. Isay (2009). A Humanist Synthesis of Memory, Language, and Emotions: Qian Mu's Interpretation of Confucian Philosophy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4):425-437.
Hagop Sarkissian (2010). Recent Approaches to Confucian Filial Morality. Philosophy Compass 5 (9):725-734.
Doris Schroeder (2012). Human Rights and Human Dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
Shaoping Gan (2009). Human Dignity as a Right. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):370-384.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2006). A Certain Kind of Moral Scepticism and the Foundations of Human Rights. Law and Justice 157:39-53.
Added to index2012-04-11
Total downloads8 ( #160,006 of 1,096,448 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #231,754 of 1,096,448 )
How can I increase my downloads?