David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 15 (2):155-175 (2000)
It is commonly accepted that thewestern view of humanity's place in nature isdominated by a dualistic opposition between nature andculture. Historically this has arisen fromexternalization of nature in both productive andcognitive practices; instances of such externalizationhave become generalized. I think the dualism can bedecomposed by identifying dominant elements in eachparticular instantiation and showing that their strictseparation evaporates under close scrutiny. The philosophical challenge this perspective presents isto substitute concrete socioecological analysis forfoundational metaphysics. A review of majorinterpretations of the history of the dualism inWestern thought indicates that the legacy is moremultistranded than is usually admitted. Modern scienceis often assumed to lie squarely within the dualism,but this is unfounded. In contrast, science providestools for contextual analysis on how human activitiesand natural processes merge. The dualism thusevaporates in actual research practice. Nevertheless,the foundational metaphysics needs to be challenged,primarily because of its paralyzing effect onenvironmental philosophy.
|Keywords||ecosocial analysis environmental philosophy environmentalism nature-culture dualism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard Evanoff (2007). Bioregionalism and Cross-Cultural Dialogue on a Land Ethic. Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (2):141 – 156.
Donald B. Thompson (2011). Natural Food and the Pastoral: A Sentimental Notion? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):165-194.
Matias Laine (2010). The Nature of Nature as a Stakeholder. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):73-78.
Similar books and articles
Michael V. McGinnis (1994). Myth, Nature, and the Bureaucratic Experience. Environmental Ethics 16 (4):425-436.
Cecilia Wee & Michael Pelczar (2008). Descartes' Dualism and Contemporary Dualism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):145-160.
Kent Johnson (2007). The Legacy of Methodological Dualism. Mind and Language 22 (4):366–401.
John A. Foster (1989). A Defense of Dualism. In J. Smythies & John Beloff (eds.), The Case for Dualism. University of Virginia Press.
David E. Cooper (2009). Art, Nature, Significance. The Philosophers' Magazine 44 (44):27-35.
William R. Uttal (2004). Dualism: The Original Sin of Cognitivism. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Anne F. Elvey (2006). Beyond Culture?: Nature/Culture Dualism and the Christian Otherworldly. Ethics and the Environment 11 (2):63-84.
Arthur O. Lovejoy (1960). The Revolt Against Dualism: An Inquiry Concerning the Existence of Ideas. La Salle, Ill.,Open Court Pub. Co..
Stacey K. Sowards (2006). Identification Through Orangutans: Destabilizing the Nature/Culture Dualism. Ethics and the Environment 11 (2):45-61.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #63,581 of 1,102,995 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,821 of 1,102,995 )
How can I increase my downloads?