David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 29 (2):131-149 (2007)
A popular if controversial claim, and troublesome for environmental philosophy, ethics, and related disciplines, is that “there is no such thing as nature.” The social constructionist version of this claim makes it difficult to draw a distinction between human and nonhuman nature. In response, first, the concept of landscape can be helpful in drawing this distinction. Second, taking this approach is consistent with at least one interpretation of Richard Rorty’s neopragmatism. Constructionism can be divided into two forms: moderate and radical. Moderate constructionism allows the landscape/nature distinction; radical constructionism excludes it. Rorty’s claim that independent reality is “the world well lost” apparently marks him as a radical constructionist. Nevertheless, the core doctrines of his neopragmatism constitute a moderate constructionism, allowing the nature/landscape distinction. The real problem is Rorty’s anthropocentric instrumentalist characterization of pragmatic justification. Left in place, it rendersneopragmatism a form of radical social constructionism. Redescribing the terms of justification in less anthropocentric instrumentalist terms is consistent with the anti-Platonist core of neopragmatism. Thus redescribed, neopragmatism is fully consistent with the landscape/nature distinction. Anthropocentric instrumentalism, not social constructionism per se, is the problem
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gideon Calder (2011). Climate Change and Normativity: Constructivism Versus Realism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):153-169.
Similar books and articles
Claus Schatz-Jakobsen (2008). Wordsworth as Scatterbrain: Deconstructing the 'Nature' of William Wordsworth's Guide to the Lakes. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):205 – 212.
H. V. S. Ogden (1955). English Taste in Landscape in the Seventeenth Century. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
Charles A. Hobbs (2011). Why Classical American Pragmatism is Helpful for Thinking About Death. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (2):182-195.
Allen Carlson (2009). Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. Columbia University Press.
Rolston (2008). Mountain Majesties Above Fruited Plains. Environmental Ethics 30 (1):3-20.
Warren G. Frisina (1997). Minds, Bodies, Experience, Nature: Is Panpsychism Really Dead? In Donald A. Crosby & Charley D. Hardwick (eds.), Pragmatism, Neo-Pragmatism, and Religion: Conversations with Richard Rorty. Peter Lang
Gunhild Setten (2001). Farmers, Planners and the Moral Message of Landscape and Nature. Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (3):220 – 225.
Elizabeth Wheeler Manwaring (1925). Italian Landscape in Eighteenth Century England. New York, Russell & Russell.
Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) (1993). Landscape, Natural Beauty, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
David W. Kidner (2000). Fabricating Nature: A Critique of the Social Construction of Nature. Environmental Ethics 22 (4):339-357.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #338,347 of 1,938,522 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #288,361 of 1,938,522 )
How can I increase my downloads?