Nature, landscape, and neo-pragmatism
Environmental Ethics 29 (2):131-149 (2007)
| Abstract | A popular if controversial claim, and troublesome for environmental philosophy, ethics, and related disciplines, is that “there is no such thing as nature.” The social constructionist version of this claim makes it difficult to draw a distinction between human and nonhuman nature. In response, first, the concept of landscape can be helpful in drawing this distinction. Second, taking this approach is consistent with at least one interpretation of Richard Rorty’s neopragmatism. Constructionism can be divided into two forms: moderate and radical. Moderate constructionism allows the landscape/nature distinction; radical constructionism excludes it. Rorty’s claim that independent reality is “the world well lost” apparently marks him as a radical constructionist. Nevertheless, the core doctrines of his neopragmatism constitute a moderate constructionism, allowing the nature/landscape distinction. The real problem is Rorty’s anthropocentric instrumentalist characterization of pragmatic justification. Left in place, it rendersneopragmatism a form of radical social constructionism. Redescribing the terms of justification in less anthropocentric instrumentalist terms is consistent with the anti-Platonist core of neopragmatism. Thus redescribed, neopragmatism is fully consistent with the landscape/nature distinction. Anthropocentric instrumentalism, not social constructionism per se, is the problem | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesClaus Schatz-Jakobsen (2008). Wordsworth as Scatterbrain: Deconstructing the 'Nature' of William Wordsworth's Guide to the Lakes. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):205 – 212.
H. V. S. Ogden (1955). English Taste in Landscape in the Seventeenth Century. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
Charles A. Hobbs (2011). Why Classical American Pragmatism is Helpful for Thinking About Death. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (2):182-195.
Allen Carlson (2009). Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. Columbia University Press.
Rolston (2008). Mountain Majesties Above Fruited Plains. Environmental Ethics 30 (1):3-20.
Warren G. Frisina (1997). Minds, Bodies, Experience, Nature: Is Panpsychism Really Dead? In Donald A. Crosby & Charley D. Hardwick (eds.), Pragmatism, Neo-Pragmatism, and Religion: Conversations with Richard Rorty. Peter Lang.
Gunhild Setten (2001). Farmers, Planners and the Moral Message of Landscape and Nature. Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (3):220 – 225.
Elizabeth Wheeler Manwaring (1925/1965). Italian Landscape in Eighteenth Century England. New York, Russell & Russell.
Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) (1993). Landscape, Natural Beauty, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
David W. Kidner (2000). Fabricating Nature: A Critique of the Social Construction of Nature. Environmental Ethics 22 (4):339-357.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,628 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,628 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
