Graduate studies at Western
Asian Philosophy 21 (4):419 - 435 (2011)
|Abstract||In this paper, I discuss subjective desire and its subtle relationship with moral facts based on a comparative study of the Analects of Confucius and the Lotus Sutra. I pick out two points in this pair of classics in order to examine their ideas about accessing the highest wisdom: (1) the relationship between desire and Confucian ren, humanity, benevolence or virtue in the Analects, and (2) the role of learning and the ontological status of the mind and the world in the Lotus Sutra. Through comparative study, I argue that the Confucian Analects and the Lotus Sutra contain two different versions of desire-based subjectivism (DBS). The difference is that Confucianism is an example of desire-based moral subjectivism (DBS-moral), and the Lotus Sutra demonstrates desire-based ontological subjectivism (DBS-ontological)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lucinda Joy Peach (2002). Social Responsibility, Sex Change, and Salvation: Gender Justice in the "Lotus Sūtra". Philosophy East and West 52 (1):50-74.
Sandra A. Wawrytko (2007). Holding Up the Mirror to Buddha-Nature: Discerning the Ghee in the Lotus Sūtra. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (1):63-81.
Anna Ghiglione (2009). Deception in Chinese Buddhist Thinking : Reflections From the Lotus Sutra and the Vimalakirti Sutra. In Leslie Anne Boldt-Irons, Corrado Federici & Ernesto Virgulti (eds.), Disguise, Deception, Trompe-L'oeil: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Peter Lang.
John Schroeder (2011). Truth, Deception, and Skillful Means in the Lotus Sūtra. Asian Philosophy 21 (1):35-52.
David Sobel (2009). Subjectivism and Idealization. Ethics 119 (2):336-352.
Joseph Grange (2001). The Lotus Sutra and Whitehead's Last Writings. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (4):385–398.
Karel Werner (2004). On the Nature and Message of the Lotus Sūtra in the Light of Early Buddhism and Buddhist Scholarship (Towards the Beginnings of Mahāyāna). Asian Philosophy 14 (3):209-221.
Gene Reeves (2001). Divinity in Process Thought and the Lotus Sutra. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (4):357–369.
Gene Reeves (2001). Introduction: The Lotus Sutra and Process Thought. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (4):355–356.
Giles Pearson (2012). Aristotle on Desire. Cambridge University Press.
Steve Odin (2001). Peace and Compassion in the Microcosmic–Macrocosmic Paradigm of Whitehead and the Lotus Sutra. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (4):371–384.
Pamela D. Winfield (2008). Visions of Awakening Space and Time: Dōgen and the Lotus Sūtra (Review). Philosophy East and West 58 (3):pp. 425-427.
A. L. Herman (1997). The Way of the Lotus: Critical Reflections on the Ethics of the Saddharmapundarika S Tra. Asian Philosophy 7 (1):5 – 22.
An-yi Pan (2008). Shaping the Lotus Sutra: Buddhist Visual Culture in Medieval China – by Eugene Y. Wang. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (1):182–185.
Added to index2011-12-15
Total downloads7 ( #142,359 of 722,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?