Graduate studies at Western
Social Epistemology 21 (3):249 – 266 (2007)
|Abstract||Endorsing the idea of group knowledge seems to entail the possibility of group belief as well, because it is usually held that knowledge entails belief. It is here studied whether it would be possible to grant that groups can have knowledge without being committed to the controversial view that groups can have beliefs. The answer is positive on the assumption that knowledge can be based on acceptance as well as belief. The distinction between belief and acceptance can be seen as a refinement of the ordinary language concept of belief, and it may be useful in understanding the nature of epistemic justification and classifying various types of epistemic subjects.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ernest Sosa (2010). Value Matters in Epistemology. Journal of Philosophy 107 (4):167-190.
Raimo Tuomela (2004). Group Knowledge Analyzed. Episteme 1 (2):109-127.
S. O. Welding (2004). Die Differenz Von Meinung Und Wissen. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35 (1):147-155.
Margaret Gilbert (1987). Modelling Collective Belief. Synthese 73 (1):185-204.
Hylarie Kochiras (2006). Belief Contexts and Epistemic Possibility. Principia 10 (1):1-20.
Hamid Vahid (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Palgrave Macmillan.
K. Brad Wray (2001). Collective Belief and Acceptance. Synthese 129 (3):319-33.
Kay Mathiesen (2006). The Epistemic Features of Group Belief. Episteme 2 (3):161-175.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads54 ( #22,613 of 739,080 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,975 of 739,080 )
How can I increase my downloads?