Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):99-100 (2000)
|Abstract||Nevin & Grace (N&G) buttress their metaphor with some good props. However, it is still not clear what momentum is analogous to. If momentum is a measure of strength, then the authors should say so and tell us how to calculate it. Furthermore, if “other” behavior can be introduced into the equation (and N&G's foray into the applied world suggests that it can), it is unclear when the masses are accrued and how much is accrued to each behavior.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. P. Laraudogoitia (2007). Avoiding Infinite Masses. Synthese 156 (1):21 - 31.
Jill Hargis (2011). From Demonization of the Masses to Democratic Practice in the Work of Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Foucault. Human Studies 34 (4):373-392.
Randolph C. Grace & John A. Nevin (2004). Behavioral Momentum and Pavlovian Conditioning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):695-697.
Hajnal Andréka, Judit Madarász X., István Németi & Gergely Székely (2008). Axiomatizing Relativistic Dynamics Without Conservation Postulates. Studia Logica 89 (2):163 - 186.
Charles P. Shimp (2000). Toward a Deconstruction of the Metaphor of Behavioral Momentum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):111-112.
Gregory Galbicka & Robert Kessel (2000). Experimenter Momentum and the Effect of Laws. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):97-98.
F. Charles Mace (2000). Clinical Applications of Behavioral Momentum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):105-106.
John A. Nevin & Randolph C. Grace (2000). Behavioral Momentum and the Law of Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):73-90.
Charlie Tanksley (2010). The Mereological Constancy of Masses. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):343-354.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?