Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):57-72 (1994)
|Abstract||If we agree, along with Arnauld, Berkeley, Descartes, Hume, Leibniz, and others that our occurrent phenomenal states serve as sources of epistemic certainty for us, we need some explanation of this fact. Many contemporary writers, most notably Roderick Chisholm, maintain that there is something special about the phenomenal states themselves that allows our certain knowledge of them. I argue that Chisholm's view is both wrong and irreparable, and that the capacity of humans to know these states with certainty has to do with the contingent cognitive capacities and abilities people have.|
|Keywords||Certainty Consciousness Epistemology Knowledge Hume|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tarja-Liisa Luukkanen (1993). In Quest of Certainty: Axel Fredrik Granfelt's Theological Epistemology. Luther-Agricola-Gesellschaft.
Brian P. McLaughlin (2000). Self-Knowledge, Externalism, and Skepticism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74 (74):93-118.
Rod Bertolet (1987). Klein on Relative Certainty. Philosophy Research Archives 13:271-274.
Nigel Pleasants (2009). Wittgenstein and Basic Moral Certainty. Philosophia 37 (4):669-679.
David Bourget (2010). Consciousness is Underived Intentìonality. Noûs 44 (1):32 - 58.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1973). Empirical Knowledge; Readings From Contemporary Sources. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Tim Bayne (2001). Chalmers on the Justification of Phenomenal Judgments. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):407 - 419.
Timothy J. Bayne (2001). Chalmers on the Justification of Phenomenal Judgments. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):407-19.
Elly Vintiadis (2006). Why Certainty is Not a Mansion. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:143-152.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,400 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,028 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?